Russia rules out return of Crimea, defying sanctions on its ailing economy

This week marks the first anniversary of Russia's legal annexation of Crimea, a territory of Ukraine that was seized in the aftermath of a revolt in Kiev. 

Maxim Shemetov/Reuters
Spectators watch the action standing next to Russian and Crimean flags during celebrations marking the first anniversary of Russia's annexation of Ukraine's Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, in central Simferopol March 16, 2015. Moscow was ready to put its nuclear forces on alert to ensure Russia's annexation of Crimea from Ukraine last year, President Vladimir Putin said in a pre-recorded documentary aired on Sunday.

Russia said it would not hand back Crimea to Ukraine, even as the US and Europe warned that retaliatory economic sanctions on Russia would remain in place.

"There is no occupation of Crimea. Crimea is a region of the Russian Federation and of course the subject of our regions is not up for discussion," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Tuesday, Reuters reports.

Moscow has said repeatedly it would not return Crimea to Ukraine. Mar. 21 marks one year since Russia's approval of the territory's annexation in the wake of the toppling of a pro-Russian president of Ukraine. 

Mr. Pesokov's statement came a day after President Vladmir Putin ordered nearly 40,000 troops to go on full alert in snap military exercises in the Arctic as part of his effort to expand Russia's presence in the region. In response to Moscow's saber-rattling, a number of former Soviet satellites in Eastern European are increasing military training. 

Washington is weighing sending troops and weapons to Ukraine, though Germany remains highly opposed to the idea. German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier last week said a surge "might only take days to spark a crisis, but it could well take years to resolve it.” On Monday, German Chancellor Angela Merkel called on Europe to maintain sanctions on Russia.

Last week, US Vice President Joe Biden told Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko that the United States would supply an additional $75 million worth of non-lethal equipment like drones, counter-mortar radar and medical kits to Ukraine's armed forces. Moscow has warned the United States that sending weapons to Ukraine would escalate tensions. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian economy continues to struggle, even with a much needed $17.5 billion boost from the International Monetary Fund.

Russia has also aired a long documentary, "Crimea: The Road Home," on the annexation of Crimea. In an on-camera interview in the 2.5-hour long film, which aired Sunday on Russian state TV, Putin accused the Americans of being the "real puppet masters" behind the pro-Western Ukrainian government. The Wall Street Journal writes:

The documentary portrayed Crimea’s annexation as a heroic emancipation of the peninsula from an onslaught of Ukrainian extremists trained by U.S. puppeteers. The peninsula’s annexation last year helped drive the Russian leader’s popularity to all-time highs at home but led to the worst divide between the West and Russia since the days of the Cold War. “Our advantage—you know what it was?” Mr. Putin said. “It was that I did this myself. It’s not that I was doing everything so correctly, but that when heads of state direct something, it’s easier for those working to carry it out.”

Ukraine, a former Soviet state, has struggled to counter Russia's propaganda. The Economist calls it a mismatch in “information warfare” and writes:

Faced with a finely-tuned and well-funded Russian propaganda machine, truth and openness ought to be Ukraine’s most powerful weapons. But truth-telling is slow and painful work, and Kiev often opts for misinformation of its own instead. The Ukrainian authorities gloss over military losses, so much so that domestic observers now interpret the government's daily situation briefings as a euphemistic code: "14 [killed] means there was lots of fighting, two means it was a relatively quiet day," says Vitaly Sych, editor of Novoe Vremya, a weekly.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to