Does ISIS's rapid advance point to local Iraqi support?

Al Qaeda offshoot ISIS, which overran the Iraqi city of Mosul yesterday, is already moving on to its next target. Its rapid progress indicates some local backing among Sunnis.

Refugees fleeing from Mosul head to the self-ruled northern Kurdish region in Irbil, Iraq, 217 miles north of Baghdad, Tuesday, June 10, 2014. Islamic militants overran parts of Iraq's second-largest city of Mosul on Tuesday. The group, Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), now appears to be fighting for control of the city of Baiji, located about halfway between Mosul and Baghdad, the capital.

A daily roundup of terrorism and security issues

A half-million people fled the Iraqi city of Mosul after it fell to militants from an Al Qaeda offshoot on Tuesday. The group, Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), now appears to be fighting for control of the city of Baiji, located about halfway between Mosul and Baghdad, the capital.

The Geneva-based International Organization for Migration reports that an estimated 500,000 people have been forced to flee areas in and around the city amid fighting between ISIS and Iraqi security forces. The organization adds that the city is facing shortages of food, fuel, and water – the last because the city's main water station was destroyed by bombing – and that the main medical center, which contains four hospitals, is largely unreachable due to fighting.

The IOM's report underscores the humanitarian and political crisis that Mosul's fall has precipitated for Baghdad. Mosul is one of Iraq's biggest cities – it has been described as both the second- and third-largest – and one of its most diverse, as home to Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds. It is also the commercial hub of northern Iraq and a cornerstone of US post-war stability efforts.

But despite its importance and the known presence of insurgent groups in the city, Mosul fell quickly to ISIS forces; their assault, which began on Friday, was a rout by Tuesday, reports Reuters. Many Iraqi troops fled in the face of ISIS' assault.

"We have lost Mosul this morning," said a colonel at a local military command center. "Army and police forces left their positions and ISIL terrorists are in full control.

"It’s a total collapse of the security forces."

A Reuters reporter saw the bodies of soldiers and policemen, some of them mutilated, littering the streets.

"We can't beat them. We can't," one officer told Reuters. "They are well trained in street fighting and we're not. We need a whole army to drive them out of Mosul.

"They're like ghosts: they appear, strike and disappear in seconds."

Al Jazeera America reports that ISIS has some 1,300 fighters in and around Mosul, and their ranks may have been bolstered with the release of 2,400 prisoners from Mosul's jails.

ISIS now appears to be focusing its attention further south, on the oil town of Baiji. Al Jazeera reports that ISIS negotiated the retreat of the 250 security officers in the town's main refinery, who left when their safety was guaranteed. ISIS subsequently advanced into the town, torching the police and fire departments and sending thousands of residents fleeing.

The Christian Science Monitor's Dan Murphy writes that "the ISIS victory is a signature moment – evidence that ISIS can't be dismissed as merely a ragtag group of Sunni insurgents who may be able to hold their own in Syria, but would be unlikely to take and hold ground from Iraqi forces."

Smaller cities in the area's east, like Tal Afar, have repeatedly fallen to insurgents over the past decade. But Mosul is a crown jewel, a center of transportation and commerce. Holding it was a government priority. Losing control, if only briefly, is a powerful indication of government failure and something that is likely to spur insurgent recruitment. What must have looked like a hopeless cause to many passive Sunni Arab supporters of the insurgency just started looking a lot more hopeful.

The Telegraph's Richard Spencer argues that ISIS' success in Mosul can be attributed in part to the effectiveness of its "advertising" in Syria, where it has been waging war against President Bashar al-Assad's regime, dominated by members of the Shiite Alawite sect.

While Syria was attracting Sunni Muslim jihadis from across the world with its message of religious purity, and using their social media savvy to tweet gruesome pictures of beheadings and crucifixions, the organization's strategists were playing a more conventional political game in neighboring Iraq.

In doing so, they were able to use both the human and financial resources for which the Syrian "cause" has been been a successful advertisement, particularly from religious sympathisers in the Gulf.

Mr. Spencer adds that in Iraq, ISIS has been careful not to alienate local populations, seeking to capitalize on Sunni hostility toward the Shiite-dominated central government, which has taken steps to cut Sunnis out of the political process.

Spencer notes that the group's success seizing the Iraqi cities of Fallujah and Ramadi a few months ago would not have been possible without local support, implying that ISIS would have needed similar backing in Mosul.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to