Venezuela: Are cracks starting to show in Maduro's backing?

A key political ally of Venezuela's embattled leader expressed sharp – and rare – criticism of the use of force to quell protests.

Rodrigo Abd/AP
In Caracas, Venezuela, people gathered Monday next to a barricade with a sign that reads in Spanish: 'He who gives up, loses.' The protests have become increasingly violent, with more than a dozen killed so far.

A daily roundup of terrorism and security issues.

A political ally of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has publicly challenged his handling of intensifying protests, suggesting a crack in the strong support base the embattled leader inherited from Hugo Chávez.

 With antigovernment protests entering their third week and reports of violence escalating, there is no sign yet that Maduro's government is in danger of collapsing. But the willingness of a key associate to break party ranks is being seen as a worrisome sign for Maduro, who has failed to capture the kind of popular devotion the late President Chávez commanded.

In a radio interview on Monday, the governor of Táchira state, José Vielma Mora, was sharply critical of his president. "I am against putting down a peaceful protest with weapons," he told Caracas-based Onda radio Monday. "No one is authorized to use violence."

Táchira, in western Venezuela, is where the country's increasingly debilitating demonstrations began. They quickly spread across the country, with participants reaching beyond their original focus of better security to voice deep discontent over the world’s highest inflation rates and shortages of basic goods.

Mr. Vielma described as excessive the government’s deployment of armed forces and fighter jets. He also cited the rough tactics of a National Guard general who allegedly beat detained protesters in Táchira.

"It's a matter of peace; all of those in jail for political motives should be sent home," Vielma said.

The criticism was particularly striking given its source. Last weekend, retired Army general Angel Vivas caused a stir by standing armed on his balcony and denouncing Maduro’s calls for his arrest (he allegedly helped protesters stretch wire across streets as part of lethal barricades). But Mr. Vivas was already viewed as a somewhat rare vocal opponent of the government within the military ranks.

Mr. Vielma, however, played a historic role in Chávez’s rise to power and was seen as standing by Maduro. According to The Wall Street Journal:

Mr. Vielma, a military officer like Mr. Chávez, participated in the failed uprising that made Mr. Chávez a household name. Six years later, Mr. Chávez won the presidency, sweeping his leftist movement and close allies—among them Mr. Vielma—into power with him.

The governor stressed that he hadn't broken away from the government but said he was in a difficult situation.

According to Reuters, “Socialist Party leaders have for years avoided making comments that could appear to be diverging from the party line, making Vielma's comment all the more uncommon.”

Venezuela’s protests are the biggest challenge so far to Maduro’s nearly 10-month-old administration. The death toll climbed to 13 on Monday as protests continued to flare nationwide, and Maduro announced a five-day public holiday beginning on Thursday in an effort to diffuse tensions, reports the Los Angeles Times.

The government says 529 people have been charged over the protests, with most given warnings. Roughly 45 people have been put behind bars.

Vielma’s comments – which also included condemning the government’s arrest of opposition leader Leopoldo Lopez on Feb. 18 – were well received by protesters nationwide.

"Look, the members of their own government are doing an about-face," José Luiz Nuñez, a chauffer in Caracas told The Wall Street Journal. "The government knows that this country is a disaster. They are scared."

Over the weekend both Maduro and opposition leader Henrique Capriles called for peace and discourse. But on Monday, Mr. Capriles declined an invitation to meet government officials at the presidential palace.

"This is a dying government .... I'm not going to be like the orchestra on the Titanic," he said, according to Reuters. "Miraflores [the presidential palace] is not the place to talk about peace, it's the center of operations for abuses of human rights."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.