What does Bangkok explosion mean for antigovernment protests?

Demonstrators have been attempting to 'shut down' Bangkok since Monday. Dozens were injured today as violence escalated after days of relative calm.

|
Wason Wanichakorn/AP
Thai anti-government protesters pack a street during a rally Friday in Bangkok, Thailand. Dozens of people were wounded in Thailand's capital Friday when a grenade exploded in a crowd of demonstrators, raising tensions in the country's political crisis.

An explosion during an antigovernment march in Bangkok today wounded at least 36 and raised concerns about escalating violence after the protest movement appeared to be losing steam in recent days.

Police told Reuters that an explosive device was thrown at a crowd marching with protest leader Suthep Thaugsuban near Chulalongkorn University in downtown Bangkok.

So far, no one has taken responsibility for the blast; the government and the protest movement blamed each other for the attack, which was likely caused by a grenade, AFP reports.

A spokesman for the protest movement told Reuters that Mr. Suthep was about 100 feet away from the explosion and was unharmed.

Antigovernment demonstrators have been attempting to “shut down” Bangkok since Monday by blocking major intersections and staging rallies throughout the city. They have vowed to occupy the city until Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra resigns and they have rejected her call for an election on Feb. 2.

So far, Prime Minister Yingluck’s government has “been praised for a restrained response to a political crisis that has been percolating for several months,” as The Christian Science Monitor’s Bangkok correspondent reported yesterday:

Police have put up no resistance to protesters blockading major intersections in Bangkok and government ministries have quietly relocated to temporary offices in response to threatened occupations.  

At least eight people have been killed and hundreds injured since the latest unrest broke out. However, none of the incidents have directly involved Thailand's influential and coup-prone army, which has called for restraint from both sides.

But the Monitor’s correspondent also noted that progovernment supporters in Bangkok are ready to act if their leaders ask them to protest and that some hardcore supporters have stockpiled ammunition and weapons.

The Council on Foreign Relation’s Joshua Kurlantzick warned earlier this week that “Many currents of tension run just below the surface of the situation in Bangkok, and were visible even on the peaceful first day of protests.”

Risk analysis firm Maplecroft and the International Crisis Group have issued warnings this week that the window of opportunity for a peaceful solution to Thailand’s conflict is narrowing.

On the other hand, Chulalongkorn University professor Pasuk Phongpaichit and historian Chris Baker write in The New York Times today that, despite today’s blast, the protesters are “losing ground with a constituency whose support they badly need: the urban middle class," and that could open up the path toward a solution:

...the demonstrations have threatened to become so disruptive to everyday life and the economy that even people who support the opposition are being turned off it. This is a significant shift, for it presents Thailand with an 11th-hour opportunity to find a peaceful resolution to the deadlock. 

The protests are the latest iteration of a cycle of violence between Bangkok’s middle class and traditional elite, and the largely poor and rural supporters of Yingluck and her brother Thaksin Shinawatra, the self-exiled former premier who was removed in a military coup in 2006.  

Yingluck has called for early elections on Feb. 2, but the opposition vows to boycott the polls – expected to be easily won by Yingluck – in favor of establishing an unelected people’s council.

Protests were sparked in early October when Yingluck’s government attempted to pass an amnesty bill that would have brought her brother back to Thailand.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What does Bangkok explosion mean for antigovernment protests?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/terrorism-security/2014/0117/What-does-Bangkok-explosion-mean-for-antigovernment-protests
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe