Kabul embroiled in day 4 of Quran burning protests

Afghan President Karzai accepted US President Obama's apology after US soldiers burned several Qurans, sparking days of protest and the killing of two US soldiers. 

Ahmad Masood/Reuters
An Afghan boy who works at a bakery watches a protest outside his window in Kabul on Friday.

• A daily summary of global reports on security issues.

Soldiers and police were on high alert in Kabul as thousands of Afghans took to the streets for a fourth day of protests over reports of NATO personnel burning of several copies of Islam's holy book. The continued protests come a day after two US soldiers were killed by a man wearing an Afghan Army uniform, indicating worsening fallout from the Qurans' burnings.

Demonstrators throwing rocks and shouting "Death to America!" and "Long live Islam!" marched toward the presidential palace after Friday prayers.  Police attempted to disperse the crowd by firing into the air; one protester was injured by the gunfire, Reuters reports.  The New York Times reports that some protesters waved Taliban flags and wore headbands bearing jihadist slogans.

Also on Friday, Afghan President Hamid Karzai met with his political allies to attempt to rein in the violent protests, which have left nearly a dozen people dead. The Times writes that while Mr. Karzai and other Afghan politicians share the public's disgust over the burning of the Qurans, they fear that if the violence continues, police or military may use deadly force against protesters. That action could, in turn, set off a cycle of violence.

Karzai has indicated that he has accepted the apology of US President Obama, which was given in a letter Thursday.  One Afghan lawmaker told the Times that in Karzai's meeting with members of Parliament, he "said that ‘according to our investigation we have found that American soldiers mistakenly insulted the Koran and we will accept their apology.’”

The incident has already harmed US efforts in Afghanistan, both directly and indirectly.  A man that NATO described as wearing an Afghan Army uniform – which, Monitor reporter Dan Murphy notes, is a "boilerplate bit of epistemological doubt" that "has become common in ISAF statements over the past year, and the killers almost always turn out to be Afghan soldiers or police" – shot and killed two US soldiers on Thursday in apparent response to the burnings.  The Taliban called on more Afghan security forces to "turn their guns on the foreign infidel invaders."

And Pakistan and Iran have both turned up the political pressure on the US. Iranian cleric Ahmad Khatami said in a speech that the Quran burning "was not a mistake. It was an intentional move, done on purpose."  And the Pakistani Foreign Ministry called the burning "utterly irresponsible."

“On behalf of the government and the people of Pakistan, we condemn in strongest possible terms the desecration of Holy Quran in Afghanistan,” a spokesman said.

Matthew Fisher, a columnist for Canada's Postmedia Network, warns that the Quran burnings haven't just harmed American efforts in Afghanistan, but they've directed a blow to Western efforts more broadly

"Thanks to a staggering blunder by American troops, the jobs of all NATO soldiers in Afghanistan, including more than 900 Canadian military advisers scattered across more than a dozen bases in Kabul and western Afghanistan, got more complicated and dangerous," he wrote.  "Given the consequences of this colossally stupid act at Bagram, Obama might have also apologized to Canada and to the other coalition forces in Afghanistan for making the work of their troops more perilous."

[ Video is no longer available. ]

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.