Stopping US teens from smoking, one town at a time

Cathy Bussewitz/AP
Retailer Holy Smokes has signs posted around its entryway to alert customers to the state's new smoking laws in Honolulu, Hawaii, Dec. 2015.

Two ways to read the story

  • Quick Read
  • Deep Read ( 3 Min. )

Across the United States, towns, cities, and counties are passing “Tobacco 21” laws banning the sale of tobacco products to those under the age of 21. These come in the wake of several failed state-level efforts to raise the smoking age. The turning point was in 2005, when the town of Needham, Mass., successfully passed Tobacco 21 legislation. Today, six states and more than 350 municipalities have passed similar laws, according to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. “We all realized that working locally was the secret sauce,” says Rob Crane, a family doctor and founder and president of the Preventing Tobacco Addiction Foundation. “There are no tobacco lobbyists at the local level, just parents, doctors, teachers, and neighbors serving on local city councils.” And in turn, success at the local level has re-energized state-level antismoking advocacy. “Taking local action in your community is definitely the way to get things moving in your home state,” says Jonathan Winickoff, a practicing general pediatrician and professor at MassGeneral Hospital for Children. “[I]t is good to keep in mind that the majority of all political parties, age groups, and even smokers themselves support these laws.”

Why We Wrote This

When it comes to cutting down on teens smoking, activists found they can enact more change by going small. Instead of working at the national level, they’re focusing on small towns and cities – and seeing big results.

When the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce was convening experts and community leaders around a health initiative, the idea of raising the smoking age from 18 to 21 kept coming up.

In fall 2015, the chamber declared that it would work to advocate for a higher smoking age throughout the region. Within a mere two weeks, legislators in both Kansas City, Mo., and Kansas City, Kan., passed ordinances in November 2015.

“The amount of interest and the momentum behind this idea surprised even us,” says Scott Hall, senior vice president for civic and community initiatives, in a phone interview. “We have exceeded our wildest dreams about how we would be able to collaborate with our local communities to make this happen.”

Why We Wrote This

When it comes to cutting down on teens smoking, activists found they can enact more change by going small. Instead of working at the national level, they’re focusing on small towns and cities – and seeing big results.

From there, the idea spread like wildfire. Today, some 28 communities in the greater Kansas City region have raised the smoking age to 21, and that number continues to grow, Mr. Hall says.

The scenario Hall describes is becoming more common across the United States, as towns, cities, and counties pass “Tobacco 21” laws banning the sale of tobacco products to those under the age of 21.   

“We have now seen six states and over 350 municipalities adopting Tobacco 21 laws,” says John Schachter, director of state communications for the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, in a phone interview. “We saw a lot of municipalities at the local level, especially in Massachusetts, start this trend.”

According to data from Mr. Schachter’s organization, the policy shift has taken place in communities ranging from large cities like Boston, Chicago, and New York to small towns with populations in the thousands or even hundreds. And he sees the legislation as key to addressing tobacco use among young adults.

“Since tobacco is so harmful, we should do everything we can to prevent tobacco use, especially among young people,” he says, noting research findings that some 95 percent of adult smokers started before age 21. “Increasing the legal age of sale to age 21 will surely help.”

Rob Crane, a family doctor and professor of family medicine at The Ohio State University, is founder and president of the Preventing Tobacco Addiction Foundation and Tobacco 21. Mr. Crane recalls his organization assisting with several failed state-level efforts to raise the smoking age.

The tide changed in 2005, he says, when the town of Needham, Mass., successfully passed Tobacco 21 legislation.

“We all realized that working locally was the secret sauce,” says Crane in an email interview. “There are no tobacco lobbyists at the local level, just parents, doctors, teachers and neighbors serving on local city councils.”

Both Crane and Schachter agree that success at the local level has fueled movement at the state level.

“Once we achieve enough local ordinances, there is then pressure in the state legislature to act,” says Crane, who predicts that by fall 2019, some 40 percent of the country will be blanketed with Tobacco 21 policies.

This growing momentum behind Tobacco 21 legislation at the local level comes as the US Food and Drug Administration is mounting an expansive campaign of enforcement around the marketing and selling of e-cigarettes to teenagers, an issue of concern for public health officials as the popularity of vaping grows in that age category.

Jonathan Winickoff, a practicing general pediatrician and professor at MassGeneral Hospital for Children, focuses his research on strategies to address tobacco use.

“Taking local action in your community is definitely the way to get things moving in your home state ... [and] it is good to keep in mind that the majority of all political parties, age groups, and even smokers themselves support these laws,” says Dr. Winickoff in an email interview. “All these successes have occurred in just the past five years, so the momentum is ... continuing to build.”

Hall says that having data about a reduction in tobacco use among youth in Needham after legislation was passed there helped fuel a snowball effect with other communities.

“Other cities began to realize the incredible impact that this could have,” he says. “We were able to articulate to our members – and to our partners in the various municipalities and counties around our metro – that if you did this, it would really work.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.