Modern field guide to security and privacy

Podcast: What to expect from Trump on cybersecurity

On this extra episode of The Cybersecurity Podcast, Jack Detsch brings you the highlights from Beat the Breach, an event cohosted by Passcode and Invincea during the RSA Conference in San Francisco.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
President Trump arrives aboard Air Force One at Orlando International Airport in Orlando, Florida. March 3, 2017.

President Trump has faced criticism for failing to strongly condemn Russia for allegedly interfering in November’s election with political hacks, leaks, and fake news. But at least one former Obama administration official thinks there's reason for hope when it comes to the Trump administration's policy to tackle digital security. 

Former White House Homeland Security Adviser Lisa Monaco says she's encouraged by the leaked draft cybersecurity executive order that circulated in the press last month, and has spent hours on the phone with her successor in the Trump White House to ensure a smooth transition. But she cautions that the US strategy over the last few years to "impose costs" on hackers – which has included using attribution and strong public statements to call out hackers and even sanctioning bad actors – must continue during the Trump administration.

"We need to continue to hold those bad actors accountable otherwise we don't have a hope of deterring that behavior," Ms. Monaco said. 

This extra episode of the Cybersecurity Podcast features highlights from an event Passcode cohosted with cybersecurity company Invincea at the RSA Conference in San Francisco last month. There, Monaco spoke along with former US Chief Information Security Officer Greg Touhill, General Motors’ Jeffrey Massimilla, US Deputy Assistant Attorney General Adam Hickey and Rich Barger, director for security research at Splunk. 

Listen to the Cybersecurity Podcast on iTunes | Soundcloud | Stitcher 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.