Modern field guide to security and privacy

Podcast: How the University of Central Florida built a hacking dynasty

In this episode of The Cybersecurity Podcast, a team of student hackers from the University of Central Florida explain how they've managed to win three consecutive titles in the National Collegiate Cyber Defense Competition.

PRNewsFoto/Raytheon Company
Students from the University of Central Florida pose after winning their third consecutive National Collegiate Cyber Defense Competition Championship.

It's a scene familiar to many cybersecurity professionals: Network defenders try to keep business running while fighting off digital attacks. 

But it's also the scenario for one of the country’s largest student cyberdefense competitions, the National Collegiate Cyber Defense Competition. And there's one group that's dominated them all: Hack@UCF, the team from the University of Central Florida that has taken home three consecutive championships.

What's their secret? Teamwork, says team captain Heather Lawrence, and knowing each member of the team's skills and weaknesses very well. 

"When people are under stress, they act differently," she says, but constant practice and a common bond of friendship can help better manage the stress of the competition. As her colleague Alex Davis points out, "we treat [the competition] almost like a part time job ... there's weeks we put in 30 hours of work. And it all pays off." 

Ms. Lawrence and Mr. Davis join the Cybersecurity Podcast this episode to share what it's like to be part of such a high-stakes college competition and how they plan to adapt to the quick-changing nature of technology. 

Also on this episode, podcast cohost Passcode's Sara Sorcher discusses the hacker community's reticence to adapt to politics infiltrating the traditionally hardcore DEF CON hacker conference. New America's Peter Singer shares some stories from an unusual Mad Scientist conference meant to help shape the way the Army fights wars in the future. 

Listen to this episode.

Follow all episodes: iTunes | Soundcloud | Stitcher 

Follow the hosts: Peter W. Singer | Sara Sorcher 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.