Modern field guide to security and privacy

Watch live: How can policymakers help secure the Internet of Things?

Join Passcode on Oct. 21 along with policy experts and lawmakers for a discussion on one of today's preeminent challenges: securing the Internet of Things.

Check back here at 9 am on Oct. 21 for live video of Securing the Internet of Things: How can policymakers help? Sign up for Passcode's email newsletter for further updates and tweet to join the conversation at #dcIOT.

With some 200 billion connected devices expected to be in homes, offices, and cars by the end of 2020, policymakers, lawmakers, and privacy watchdogs are increasingly alarmed about the security and privacy implications of the Internet of Things. Many are pressing for laws to protect consumers. At the same time, many tech firms are pushing back and warning regulation will stifle innovation. Is there a middle ground where regulation can aid users without blunting the growth of IoT?

Join us for an in-depth discussion with leading figures from Congress, the Federal Trade Commission, and some of the world's biggest technology companies to understand how Washington is thinking about IoT right now, and what the private sector is doing on its own to safeguard this fast emerging marketplace.

Program

Sponsor Remarks

Ned Curic, Chief Technology Officer for Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. (@Toyota)

Keynote Panel

Sen. Brian Schatz (D) of Hawaii, @SenBrianSchatz, Ranking Member, Communications and Technology Subcommittee, Senate Commerce

Julie Brill, @JulieBrillFTC, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission

All panels moderated by Mike Farrell, @mikebfarrell, Editor, Passcode

Panel Discussion

Tom Cross, @_decius_, CTO, Drawbridge Networks

Eric Wenger, @EricWenger, Director, Cybersecurity & Privacy Policy, Cisco

Peter Lefkowitz, Chief Privacy Officer, General Electric

Event Details

Wed., Oct. 21, 2015
9 - 11:00 a.m.
Toyota North America Inc.
325 7th Street NW, Suite 1000
Washington DC 20004

Follow the conversation on Twitter via the hashtag #dcIOT and follow us @csmpasscode. Sign up for Passcode here.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.