Modern field guide to security and privacy

Watch live: The encryption debate

What's the right balance between protecting people's personal privacy and the country's security? Join Passcode for a discussion with key figures in the debate between US law enforcement and the tech sector over encryption starting at 9 am on Tuesday, Sept. 15. 

Check back here at 9 am for live video of The Encryption Debate. Sign up for Passcode's email newsletter for further updates here and tweet to join the conversation at #CSMCrypto.

Major American companies moved to ramp up security on their consumer devices to fight hackers and eavesdropping governments, in the wake of the Edward Snowden revelations about National Security Agency surveillance two summers ago. But senior law enforcement and intelligence officials say the new default protections prevent them from catching dangerous terrorists and criminals, and have called on companies such as Apple and Google to find a secure way for them to access consumers' data with a warrant – which many technologists and privacy advocates claim is tantamount to building a "backdoor" into otherwise strong encryption.

Speakers:

Sponsor remarks: 

Brett Hansen, Executive Director and GM, Dell Data Security Solutions (@DellSecurity)

Keynote interview:

Amy Hess, FBI Executive Assistant Director, Science & Technology

Q&A: Moderated by Sara Sorcher, @SaraSorcher, Deputy Editor, CSM Passcode

Panel discussion:

Kiran Raj, US Department of Justice, Senior Counsel to the Deputy Attorney General

Jon Callas, @joncallas, Silent Circle, Chief Technology Officer

Matt Blaze, @mattblaze, University of Pennsylvania, Associate Professor, Computer and Information Science

Moderated by: Sara Sorcher, @SaraSorcher, Deputy Editor, CSM Passcode

Event details:

Tuesday, September 15, 2015
9:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.
St. Regis Hotel / Carlton Ballroom
923 16th St NW
Washington, DC

You can follow Passcode on Twitter at @CSMPasscode

Join the conversation via the hashtag #CSMCrypto.

Sign up for Passcode's weekly emails at www.csmpasscode.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.