Maya DiRado and a night of Olympic surprises

Maya DiRado, an American swimmer at her first Olympics, captured gold by a fingertip in the 100-meter backstroke – and surprised even herself.

Michael Sohn/AP
Maya Dirado is overcome with excitement after catching Katinka Hosszu in the final meters of the Olympic 200-meter backstroke in Rio. She beat the "Iron Lady" from Hungary by six-hundredths of a second, ending her gold-medal streak at these Games.

It’s hard to train for surprise.

Olympians so methodically prepare for and measure everything else. The ounces of food. The angle of a knee. The hundredths or even thousandths of a second.

And after four years of crunching numbers, they hope there is an Olympic medal on the other side of the equation.

But there was no way to quantify the joy of American swimmer Maya DiRado, who seemed to surprise even herself by winning gold in the 200-meter backstroke Friday night.

Yes, she already had three medals – one of each color – from the Rio Olympics, her best-ever international competition. But the 200-meter backstroke was not her best event. So when she slipped into silver-medal contention behind Katinka Hosszu, the Hungarian “Iron Lady” who had won three straight golds in Rio so far, that seemed like a huge accomplishment.

But then, in the final stride, she lunged for the wall – and won by a fingertip.

DiRado is no stranger to success, achieving a perfect math score on her SATs at age 15 and going on to be a standout swimmer at Stanford University. She is also incredibly poised. But on Friday night, even she was overcome with excitement.

And those are the little moments that keep some magic in the Olympics, no matter how commercialized and heavily scripted they have become.

There were other fun surprises at the pool Friday night, too. Anthony Ervin came back at age 35 to win gold in the 50-meter free, 16 years after tying for first with friend Gary Hall, Jr. in the Sydney Olympics. (That should feel good after he sold his first individual gold on eBay for $17,101, which he reportedly sent to support Indonesia tsunami aid efforts in 2004.)

Michael Phelps, after beating nemesis Chad Le Clos from South Africa earlier this week, stood side by side smiling with him and László Cseh after the three tied for silver in the 100-meter butterfly Friday night.

In the 800-meter freestyle, Katie Ledecky may not have surprised anyone. But her split at the halfway point of her 800m was faster than the time of the bronze medalist in the 400m earlier in the week, and then she went on to break her own world record in the 800-meter. That makes her the first swimmer to sweep the Olympic 200, 400, and 800-meter freestyle races since 1968.

And earlier in the week Simone Manuel, a Stanford athlete competing in the 100-meter freestyle, became the first African-American swimmer to win gold – a feat that reduced not only her but coach Greg Meehan to tears. The best kind.

And that was just the Americans, just in the pool.  

For all the doom and gloom we heard leading up to Rio, it’s turning out to be a surprisingly magical Games.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.