American women on skis are revving for Sochi

Female skiers from the US – a cross-country groundbreaker, an alpine racer, and high-flying ski jumpers – hope to make their marks, and even take medals, at the Sochi Games. Let's meet these Olympians.

1. Kikkan Randall: a breakout for women's cross-country skiing?

Heikki Saukkomaa /Lehtikuva/AP
American skier Kikkan Randall reacted after winning the ladies World Cup sprint event at the Lahti Ski Games on March 9, 2013.

No American woman has ever won an Olympic medal in cross-country skiing. But Kikkan Randall never let that slow her down. This year, she is heading to the Olympics in Sochi, Russia, as a reigning world champion and a medal favorite in the individual sprint.

Perhaps more impressive than her results, Randall took an inclusive approach to her pursuit of excellence, cultivating a new generation of US cross-country skiers that is turning heads with medals of their own – and strong team spirit.

In a sport in which that kind of team spirit is often lost amid competing personalities, the Americans are an exception, showing up on relay days wearing striped socks and glitter, going sledding together on days off, and challenging competitors from other countries to music-video contests.

"Our team has set a standard on the World Cup.... Other teams want to re-create that," says Liz Stephen, who is headed to Sochi.

Randall, from Anchorage, Alaska, for years was one of the few American women on the World Cup circuit, and she often finished in the 40s or 50s. But she was confident the United States could rise to the top.

"At a time when [other American skiers] were kind of embarrassed to be [representing the] USA, she was dyeing her hair red, white, and blue. It was almost like that glass ceiling was never there for her, and if it had been, she would have just shattered it anyway," says Holly Brooks, Randall's teammate at Alaska Pacific University in Anchorage.

– Christa Case Bryant, Staff writer

1 of 3

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.