London 2012 Olympics: Has Russian sports machine broken down?

Russia's sports minister warned of 'disciplinary decisions' in response to a fifth-place overall standing at London 2012. About a fifth of Russians say the Olympics were a 'complete failure' for Russia.

|
Adrees Latif/Reuters
The words London 2012 are seen on a lanyard around the neck of Russia's Ilya Zakharov as he stretches his gold medal toward photographers after winning the men's 3m springboard final at the London 2012 Olympic Games at the Aquatics Centre August 7.

As a former sports superpower that rarely finished outside the top three in Olympic medal counts, Russians are expressing deep anxieties about a less-than-stellar performance in London this year. 

Though the medal count has grown over the past couple of days, and Russia is currently fifth in overall standings. Many worry that the once great sports machine may be broken, and Russia may be due to be humiliated when it sponsors the Sochi Winter Games in barely two years time

A poll released at the beginning of this week – before the current Russian surge began – found that 69 percent of Russians were "dissatisfied" with Team Russia's Olympic performance. The survey, reported by the official ITAR-Tass agency, found that about a fifth of Russians viewed the Olympics as a "complete failure" for Russia, while about half believed that "this is an unexpectedly bad result." 

The Russian Olympic Committee had put its gold medal target at between 20 and 30 in the Olympics' total of 302 events. Four years ago, in Beijing, the Russian team came in third with 23 gold medals. In Athens, in 2004, Russia also ranked third, with 27 gold medals. At the Sydney Games in 2000, Russia took 32 gold medals. 

At the end of Day 11 of the London Games, Russia was in fifth place – behind South Korea, Britain, the US, and China – with just 10 gold medals, and seemingly little chance to close the gap before the spectacle ends on Aug. 12. 

"Our Olympic performance this year has given rise to all sorts of dark humor," says Alexei Mukhin, director of the independent Center for Political Information in Moscow. "For instance, it was reported that Putin came to London and visited with our Olympic judo team – and then they won! So people say it's Putin's fault other teams fell short, because he failed to visit them." 

Russian Sports Minister Vitaly Mutko has threatened to "to draw very harsh conclusions in certain sports," where teams fail to win enough medals. "It’s almost like war for us," Russian media quoted him as saying. "The main thing is to get to the end and all the disciplinary decisions will be made later."

Yesterday Mr. Putin pledged to "thoroughly analyze" the Olympic results before drawing conclusions. "We failed in some sports disciplines where our organizers and specialists expected medals, and we got gold medals in others where we did not expect," Putin said. 

Only former president and current Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, ever the moderate, chose to look on the bright side. "There are many silver medals this year, we are a silver country, this is good. It means our sport potential remains very high," Mr. Medvedev told journalists yesterday. 

Russia's slide from sports superpower status was on full display at the Vancouver Winter Games two years ago, where Russia finished in sixth place. At that time, sports officials promised to get serious about fighting corruption and improving discipline in the preparations for the upcoming Sochi Winter Games, where teams will be competing on home turf. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to London 2012 Olympics: Has Russian sports machine broken down?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Olympics/2012/0808/London-2012-Olympics-Has-Russian-sports-machine-broken-down
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe