Olympics medal count: China edges back out in front of US Wednesday

The US scored big Tuesday at the London Olympics when Michael Phelps and the women's gymnastics team brought home historic wins. But the Chinese climbed back on top of the medal chart Wednesday.

Kai Pfaffencbach/Reuters
Bronze medallist from left to right: Natalie Dell, Kara Kohler, Megan Kalmoe and Adrienne Martelli of the US pose during the victory ceremony after the women's quadruple sculls at Eton Dorney during the London Games August 1.
Rich Clabaugh/Staff

The US dominated day four of the London Olympics, with outstanding performances by swimming superstar Michael Phelps and the "Fab Five" women's gymnastics team. The women won the team gold medal, and Phelps won silver in the men's 200-meter butterfly, and gold with his team in the men's four by 200-meter freestyle relay.

However, by Wednesday afternoon, China regained the medal lead, 30-29. China was also still ahead in the gold medal count, with 17 to the US's 12.

Phelps and the women's gymnastics team may have been the main attraction on Tuesday, but what really helped put the US over the top were three solid performances on Tuesday and Wednesday morning by little-known athletes.

On Tuesday Caitlin Leverenz, 21, from Tucson, Ariz., took the the bronze medal in the women's 200-meter individual medley. She may have been outperformed by Chinese phenomenon Ye Shiwen (who set a new Olympic record in the race) and Aussie Alicia Coutts, but Leverenz, who narrowly missed the cut off for the Beijing Games, has nothing to be ashamed of, winning her first Olympic medal against the world's best.

On Wednesday morning Boise, Idaho resident Kristin Armstrong (no relation to Lance Armstrong) won the gold medal in the women's cycling road race. Armstrong, 38, originally trained as a triathlete, but has since proven her cycling chops, winning her first gold in Beijing

A US rowing team also medalled Wednesday morning. Kara Kohler, Megan Kalmoe, Adrienne Martelli, and Natalie Dell won the bronze in the women's quadruple sculls. The rowing and cycling medals were the first for the US in those sports at the London Games.

There were plenty of medals up for grabs for the US Wednesday afternoon.

Danell Leyva captured a bronze medal in the gymnastics all-around finals. Teammate John Orozco finished ninth in the competition.

US swimmers competed in four races Wednesday afternoon, the men's 200-meter breaststroke, the women's 200-meter butterfly, the men's 100-meter freestyle, and the women's four by 200-meter freestyle relay. Dana Vollmer, who won the gold medal and broke the world record in the women's 100-meter butterfly, helped the Americans to a gold medal in the women's relay, and Nathan Adrian edged out Australia's James Magnussen for gold in the men's 100-meter freestyle.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.