London 2012: Artistic gymnastics men's rings individual event is up for grabs

London 2012 - Artistic gymnastics men's rings: The Russians had the top team score in men's rings Monday, but in individual competition China's Chen Yibing is favored to win.

Matt Dunham/AP
London 2012: Artistic gymnastics men's rings– Chinese gymnast Chen Yibing performs on the rings during the artistic gymnastic men's team final at the Summer Olympics, July 30.

The finals for the individual rings event in men's artistic gymnastics will be held on August 6, but if Monday's team competition was any indication, it could be anyone's game.

The Russians came in first in rings Monday, followed by the Japanese, and then the Ukrainians. The US took fourth place, and China was in fifth.  

China's Chen Yibing is now heavily favored to win the individual finals. He took the gold on the rings in Beijing, and won his fourth career world title on the rings at the world championships in Tokyo, in 2011.

Chen had one of the best scores on rings in Monday's team event, with a 15.8. Averaged with his teammates' relatively low scores it was not enough to win the event for China, though in the end the Chinese did take the team gold for men's artistic gymnastics rings.

Chen is originally from the Tianjin Province in China. According to the London 2012 web site, he enjoys music, playing computer games, football, and eating. 

Based on Monday's scores, Chen's main competition in the individual event may be the Russians. Aleksandr Balandin scored slightly higher than Chen with a 15.816, and his teammate Denis Ablyazin was just behind with a 15.6.

The highest scorer on the rings from the US was Jonathan Horton, from Houston, Texas, who got a 15.26. Horton is an Olympic veteran, but the rings are not his strongest event. In Beijing he won the silver medal on the high bar.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to London 2012: Artistic gymnastics men's rings individual event is up for grabs
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today