Voice of disapproval: Lebanese pop star abandons jihadist cause in Syria

Fadel Shaker's about-face stands as a symbol of a wider crisis facing jihadist groups in Syria. Dozens of Saudis and more than 100 Jordanians have reportedly defected as well.

Bilal Hussein/AP/File
In this Feb. 8, 2013 file photo, Lebanese pop idol Fadel Shaker delivers a sermon in support of Syrian rebel fighters and Syrian refugees, after the Friday prayer, in Beirut, Lebanon.

Lebanese pop star Fadel Shaker gave unique momentum to jihadists in Syria when he took up their cause in 2012. But his sudden defection has had the opposite effect.

Mr. Shaker is the latest and the most high-profile of hundreds of jihadist fighters and supporters turning their backs on Islamist militias in Syria, disillusioned after three years of warfare failed to improve conditions for Sunni Muslims or establish Islamic law.

Shaker stunned the music industry and the wider Arab world in September 2012 by renouncing his multimillion-dollar music career for hard-line Islamist activism. He aligned himself with Lebanese jihadist cleric Ahmed al-Assir, who reportedly maintains strong ties with Al Qaeda-linked Jabhat al-Nusra. 

He disavowed the very pop tunes that made him a household name across the Middle East – claiming love songs such as his chart-topping “come my love” were “forbidden” in his new strict interpretation of Islam – and began funneling off his personal fortune to Syrian militants.

In April 2013, Shaker announced the formation of a jihadist “free resistance brigade,” consisting of “Muslim men that want to defend the honor and Muslim lands,” to fight Syrian government forces and the Lebanese Shiite militant movement Hezbollah.

Shaker became a figurehead for hard-line Islamist militias fighting in Syria, urging disenfranchised young Muslims to “stand up and defend Muslim lands” in Syria, even singing in a television rally “God gave me the gift and invited me to join the jihad … Death does not frighten me, and my wish is to become a martyr.”

Shaker denied through his lawyer that he fought in Syria. However, he publicly declared taking part in an attack by Islamist militants led by Mr. Assir on the Lebanese army in the southern city of Sidon in 2013 that left 18 soldiers dead. He bragged that he killed two soldiers himself in a YouTube video that went viral.

Yet on March 8, in his first televised interview in nearly two years, Fadel Shaker appeared on Lebanese LBC network, clean-shaven and in a pressed suit, announcing that he had severed ties with Assir and wanted back his “normal life.” 

He did not give a reason behind the sudden transformation, saying only through his lawyer that he has “abandoned the hard-line religious path.”

Shaker’s defection caught the jihadist community off-guard, prompting Al Nusra leader Abdullah Muheissini to take to Twitter to plead for his return. “I am surprised you have left the path.… Perhaps the path to jihad is wrought with hardships, but you have not tasted its sweetness,” Mr. Muheissini wrote.

The crooner’s about-face stands as a symbol of a wider crisis facing jihadist groups in Syria.

Over 100 Jordanian fighters have reportedly defected from jihadist militias such as Al Nusra and the Islamic State, in addition to dozens of Saudi nationals and reportedly hundreds of European fighters who have attempted to break ranks and return to their homeland.

Like Shaker, they too feel misled by clerics promising jihad and glory, and fed up with turf wars between different militant groups that detracts from their fight against Assad. Now they simply wish to return to their “normal lives” away from the front lines. 

Yet also like Shaker, most jihadist defectors face prosecution in their homeland upon their return.

Shaker was sentenced to death in absentia for his role in attacks on the Lebanese army – a sentence his legal team hope to reduce or repeal – while Jordan has jailed more than 60 former fighters on sentences between three and five years.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.