Syria plans to replace rubble with luxury developments

Plans for Marota City, an investment project in Damascus, features luxury high-rises and shopping centers. Many developments are under way in former rebel-held areas but critics of President Bashar Assad believe the rebuilding projects are politically motivated. 

Hassan Ammar/AP
The site of Marota City, a planned luxury development in southwestern Damacus, Syria, is prepared for rebuilding on Oct. 8. Critics allege that President Bashar Assad is using developments like this one to consolidate his power after the civil war.

At a building site in Damascus, trucks and bulldozers zigzag back and forth ferrying sand and stones for a luxury development of residential high-rises and shopping centers.

The area was up until recently a working-class neighborhood of informal settlements and irregular housing running through orchards and farmland – one that early on in Syria's conflict was a hub for protests against the government. Over the past year, thousands of residents have been evicted and their property razed to make way for the multimillion-dollar project that promises to be the new commercial center for the capital.

Marota City, as Syria's largest investment project is known, is seen as setting the blueprint for how the government will undertake the ambitious rebuilding of areas devastated in the nearly eight-year civil war.

The government is using controversial new property laws to create zones where partnerships of the government and businessmen take ownership of neighborhoods and redevelop them. Officials say the projects aim at re-planning slums and destroyed areas and attracting private investors to join the massively expensive task of reconstruction.

Critics say President Bashar Assad is using such projects to consolidate post-war power, expropriate property, and reshape Syria's demographics by pushing out impoverished communities seen as centers of opposition support and replacing them with wealthier ones more likely to be loyalists.

The president has survived the war, using help from allies Russia and Iran to crush an armed rebellion that aimed to oust him.

The Marota project lies at the heart of Syria's tangled web of politics and rebuilding. Having recaptured the country's key cities from the opposition, the government says it is now time to focus on rebuilding. But Western countries, including the United States, say they will not commit any funds to reconstruction without real progress on a political settlement.

The plan for upscale apartments and glossy malls in Damascus can seem particularly jarring with the enormous destruction in former rebel-held areas just a few miles away and in the rest of the country, where entire city blocks lie crumpled, in scenes reminiscent of World War II.

Marota is being built over a southwestern neighborhood called Basateen al-Razi that grew up on farmlands over the past decades as poorer Syrians moved in from the countryside and built unlicensed housing. The district saw anti-government protests in 2012, but they were swiftly suppressed in a crackdown, and the area was relatively untouched by the war's destruction.

The project was approved in 2012 with a legislative law known as Decree No. 66, which authorized the government to redevelop slum dwellings and illegal housing areas in the capital.

This allowed the Damascus governorate to evict the population, which has largely dispersed to other, inexpensive parts of the capital, and level the district.

The project is managed chiefly by the Syrian government, under a joint-stock company called Cham Holding established in 2016 and owned by the Damascus governorate. It has attracted investments from businessmen known to have close ties to the Syrian leadership, including Samer Foz, a wealthy entrepreneur whose name became well known during the war and who recently bought majority shares in the landmark Four Seasons hotel in the capital. The company is also said to be linked to Rami Makhlouf, Mr. Assad's cousin and one of Syria's most powerful businessmen.

"I expect the commercial center to shift here," says Nasouh Nabolsi, chief executive officer for Damascus Cham holding, the company undertaking the management, construction, and investment works.

Speaking to The Associated Press at the company's stylish headquarters adjacent to the building site, he said the company has so far spent the equivalent of $70 million on infrastructural works for the 2.14 million square meter development. Construction is expected to begin before the end of the year. The project will provide 12,000 housing units for an estimated 60,000 residents.

Marota will be followed by a similar project further south on an area four times bigger, called Basilia City, Mr. Nabolsi said, adding that plans to develop these areas existed before the Syrian conflict erupted in 2011.

In April, the government passed controversial property Law No. 10, which expanded the geographic scope of decree 66 beyond Damascus to the rest of the country and extended it from informal settlements to regularly registered property.

Under Law 10, residents initially had just 30 days to prove that they own property in redevelopment zones in order to receive shares in the projects or alternative plots of land; otherwise, ownership would be transferred to the local government.

The law created panic among refugees abroad, many of whom had lost property deeds or could not return to prove ownership. After an international outcry, Syria's foreign minister announced in June that the 30-day filing period would be extended to a year. Last month, a United Nations official said Syria's government has withdrawn the law, citing Russia for the information.

However, there is no sign that the law has been formally amended or confirmation that it has been withdrawn.

At least four former-rebel held areas in and around the capital are now being considered for redevelopment under Law 10. They include Barzeh, Jobar, Daraya, and Qaboun, where major demolitions are already underway, according to a Human Rights Watch investigation.

Sara Kayyali, Syria researcher at HRW, said the fact that the designated areas are all former rebel-held bastions and the lack of transparency around the property laws only exacerbates suspicions.

"The government's urban planning laws are often used to confiscate the property of residents, leave them without any alternative housing, and never provide them with compensation, so violating their property rights on more than one level," she told the AP.

A resident of Damascus' Mazzeh neighborhood whose family owns property in nearby Basateen al-Razi and closely follows the subject said the new property laws were not necessarily a bad thing, but the implementation gives the impression that the government is driving out poor residents and attracting the rich.

She said demolitions started without the provision of alternative housing, and rental money offered was often insufficient to rent within Damascus. She spoke on condition of anonymity for security concerns.

Nabolsi rejects the claims and argues that everyone has been more than fairly compensated.

He said there is nothing wrong with developing society, adding that the Syrian crisis was fueled by poor people who were exploited.

"The mistake of the government is that it did not develop these areas and let them transform into illegal housing areas, and we paid a high price for this."

Ms. Kayyali said there is concern that the laws will be used as a form of "collective punishment" against government opponents and dispossess the poor.

"It's going to exacerbate the socio-economic imbalance that was actually one of the causes of the uprising," she said.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. AP writers Hiba Dlewati in Beirut and Albert Aji in Damascus, Syria, contributed to this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Syria plans to replace rubble with luxury developments
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today