Islamic State targeting Libyan oil to make trouble, not a profit

A string of IS attacks on oil installations are designed to harm Libya and Europe economically rather than replace lost revenues in the group's Syrian and Iraqi strongholds, experts say.

Fire rises from an oil tank in the port of Sidra, in Ras Lanuf, Libya, January 6, 2016. IS militants attacked Libya’s largest crude oil terminal in terms of loading capacity, Sidra, sparking massive fires that destroyed at least five tankers and burned until late Saturday.

When the Islamic State first set its eyes on Libya, it no doubt saw fertile soil for conquest in a lawless land being fought over by myriad political and military factions.

The security vacuum left by the collapse of Muammar Qaddafi’s regime in 2011 made Libya a jihadist destination of choice after Syria and Iraq. And its position as a gateway to Europe and Africa, along with the presence of vast oil and gas reserves, only increased the attraction. 

Now a string of recent IS attacks on oil regions and facilities have stirred concerns that IS, which has profited greatly from the sale of Syrian and Iraqi oil, assets which have been targeted by US-led airstrikes, could be seeking to replace that revenue with Libyan reserves. 

Abul-Mughira al-Qahtani, identified by IS late last summer as the leader of its Libya branch, stressed in an August interview the strategic importance of controlling this “well of resources that cannot dry,” using them to the benefit of Muslims worldwide and to the detriment of non-believers.

“The control of the Islamic State over this region will lead to economic breakdowns, especially for Italy and the rest of the European states,” he told the IS propaganda magazine Dabiq.

In the near term, however, the greatest threat is to the welfare of Libya’s citizens and to the financial viability of a future Tripoli-based government due to take power under a UN-brokered deal. And the goal of IS, which reportedly has some 3,000 fighters in Libya, seems to be to disrupt oil exports, rather than take control of oilfields. 

In recent days, IS militants attacked Libya’s largest crude oil terminal in terms of loading capacity, Sidra, sparking massive fires that destroyed at least five tankers and burned until late Saturday. A suicide bomber also hit a checkpoint on Jan. 7 at the entrance of Ras Lanuf, home to a massive refinery.

The two oil terminals sit 18 miles apart in Libya’s “oil crescent region.” IS didn’t claim the Ras Lanuf attack but said it was behind a truck bombing hours earlier, which hit a police training center in Zliten and killed 50 people, the deadliest single attack since 2011. The group has been making a push east from its stronghold in the coastal city of Sirte. 

Situation unlike Syria or Iraq

Several days of clashes between IS militants and the Petroleum Facilities Guard resulted in dozens of casualties and the burning down of two additional tankers in Ras Lanuf, according to local media. An official of the National Oil Corporation told Reuters Monday that the oil stored in Ras Lanuf was taken to a safer location.

According to analysts, the IS goal for now is to disrupt the potential revenue streams of the state versus directly exploiting or exporting these resources.

“IS in Libya seems more interested in destroying oil installations or at least stopping the production rather than, as in Syria, controlling the fields and selling the oil,” says Mattia Toaldo, policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations.

“Bear in mind that oil income now goes into the coffers of the Central Bank, which in turn pays all salaries, including those of the militias which could potentially compete with IS,” adds Mr. Toaldo.

He points out that the vast size and geography of Libya makes it more costly to transport oil by trucks. IS would also face tough competition from rival smugglers of petrol and other refined products, a longstanding tradition in a country that borders Tunisia, Algeria, Niger, Chad, Sudan, and Egypt.

In a December 2015 report, the International Crisis Group (ICG) warned that “the dysfunctional security system for oil and gas infrastructure presents a tempting target for IS militants.” Between February and March last year, IS militants attacked the Mabruk, Ghani, and Dahra oil fields in the central Sirte basin, killing many of the guards and kidnapping foreign oil workers.

In October, they took aim at the Sidra port, which used to receive 200 ships per year and had a loading volume of 447,00 barrels per day in January 2011, according to the Libya Oil Almanac.

Too hard for IS to market Libyan oil

ICG’s senior Libya analyst, Claudia Gazzini, says the rationale of such attacks is to stop “apostate states from getting money from oil sales” as well as weakening the state. But it is “highly improbable” that IS will reach a stage whereby it can export refined fuels – even if it were to capture and control the oil terminals.

“I just don’t see that shipping line opening up without the international community being able to very easily target and stop those tankers,” she says.

Also unlikely, she adds, is the prospect that IS would become a refiner and distributor of fuel in Libya's domestic market. This is because Libya's few operational refineries are complex, large-scale facilities that are difficult to run, compared to the smaller refineries found in Iraq and Syria. Another factor is subsidies that would make it hard to compete with Libya's state-supplied fuel, provided its government is still solvent. 

Last week’s attacks have further dented Libya's economic standing. The Economist Intelligence Unit forecasts that its economy would shrink by 8 percent in 2016, the worst outlook in the world.

“You can repair tanks, but you need a certain level of security to have foreign engineers come in, repair tanks and put Sidra online again,” says Gazzini. “After these attacks, that is probably not going to happen for another year, so the possibility of an economic collapse has become even more serious now.”

Risk is high for oil companies

Many hope that the UN-brokered unity government, which received the backing of some representatives from rival administrations in the east and west, will help the country change course. The stakes are high for Europe, which fears both an ascendant IS in Libya and the flow of migrants using it as a launching pad to cross the Mediterranean.

The European Union has pledged $108 million to help Libya fight IS, as soon as the unity government comes to power. Still, given the future government's broad array of opponents, many are pessimistic, including oil companies, which have either halted or scaled back their operations in Libya.

“Controlling the oil is both a short and long-term goal of IS,” says Keith Lamb, a security consultant worked in Libya until 2014 and now heads Lamb’s Security Solutions.

“By controlling the ports, oil fields as well as the pipelines, you pretty much control the money any government could make from the sale of oil,” he says. “It also prevents outside investors from coming into the country. The majority of oil companies are not willing to take the risk of getting back into Libya right now.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Islamic State targeting Libyan oil to make trouble, not a profit
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today