Cairo bathhouse acquittals: Was TV reporter too close to the story?

Debauchery charges brought against 26 men arrested at a Cairo bathhouse spurred international condemnation. In Egypt, a reporter's presence during the police raid raised a storm of criticism.

|
Amr Nabil/AP
Relatives of 26 men who were arrested in a televised raid last month by police looking for gays at a Cairo public bathhouse, celebrate after an Egyptian court acquitted them in Cairo, Monday, Jan. 12, 2015. The trial, which had caused an uproar among activists and rights groups, captured public attention after a pro-government TV network aired scenes of half-naked men being pulled from the bathhouse by police.

The acquittal Monday of 26 men arrested naked in a Cairo bathhouse came as a surprise to many here, considering that a government-led crackdown against the country’s gay community has won popular support. A similar trial recently ended in three-year sentences for all of the accused.

But this was no ordinary case, ignited as it was by a televised police raid on the bathhouse. The complicity of Mona Iraqi, a television presenter, in the arrest drew public condemnation over her cooperation with the police so their raid unfolded as her cameras rolled.

“This wasn’t the first time [that the media cooperated with police], but it was the most shocking time,” says Scott Long, a Cairo-based human rights activist who focuses on gay issues. “This case became symbolic for a lot of people of the way in which the media colludes with the police and the state.”

Video footage showed dozens of naked men being herded into a police truck on Dec. 7, with Ms. Iraqi standing behind them, her cameraphone held aloft. She claimed to have tipped off the police and included footage in an exposé broadcast on a private, pro-regime television station the following evening.

But then the backlash began. By mid-December, Egypt’s state, private, and social media were abuzz with criticism, saying Iraqi had crossed a line. When the case made it to court, her name was not in the court papers, and the sitting judge refused to call her to the stand, instead relying on the alleged eyewitness testimony of a single policeman. 

On Monday, Egypt’s leading daily newspaper, Al-Masry Al-Youm, said Iraqi’s actions should prompt a “flood of questions” over the relationship between a journalist and the police.

Questions about the evidence

By the final court hearing on Jan. 4, defense lawyers say, the prosecution’s case had unraveled completely.

“Legally, it was based on nothing,” says Islam Khalifa, a lawyer who knows what it’s like to fight unpopular cases. In November 2014 he mounted the defense in what has come to be known here as the “gay marriage case,” which ended with the eight defendants being sentenced to three years in prison.

In the bathhouse case, the prosecution’s witness insisted he had seen the defendants having gay sex. But the state’s own medical evidence – based on a medically discredited and physically abusive rectal examination – was said to indicate only that three of the men had physical indications consistent with such activity, but did not explain conclusively how these could have occurred.

The case drew stinging international criticism. "The deliberate, public humiliation of these men conducted in tandem with the media is shocking, but typical of an intensifying and troubling government clampdown on the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community in Egypt," New York-based Human Rights Watch said in a statement.

Ordeal not over yet

During a similar crackdown in 2001, Human Rights Watch documented more than 170 “debauchery” cases that were brought before prosecutors. Since the overthrow of Islamist President Mohamed Morsi in July 2013, police have detained around 150 people on the same charges. Debauchery is a codeword that Egypt uses to refer to homosexual acts. 

Despite Monday’s acquittals, the ordeal for the men and their families is not over yet. Egypt’s public prosecutor says the verdict will be appealed, and in socially conservative Egypt, it will take more than a court verdict to clear the men’s names in the eyes of their communities.

“Families were torn apart because of this,” says Mr. Khalifa. 

When the verdict broke, the courtroom was filled with a defiant blend of jubilation and anger. “Mona Iraqi should go to prison for this,” shouted one woman, the sister of one of the defendants. “She’s robbed him of something he cannot get back – his life.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Cairo bathhouse acquittals: Was TV reporter too close to the story?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2015/0112/Cairo-bathhouse-acquittals-Was-TV-reporter-too-close-to-the-story
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe