Building a shared Jerusalem: One design firm takes up the task

Studio Aya has produced detailed renderings of nearly every key challenge involved in dividing Jerusalem between Israel and the future Palestine.

Courtesy of SAYA
This photographic rendering depicts a proposed pedestrian checkpoint between the Palestinian and Israeli sides of a divided Jerusalem. It would span Road 60, the main artery into Jerusalem, less than a mile north of the Old City.

Negotiators talk about it. Military experts calculate the risks. Peaceniks dream of the benefits. But in all the discussions about peace between Israelis and Palestinians, few have ever asked what this would actually look like at street level.

So in 2003, a decade after the initial Oslo Accord was signed, architecture students Karen Lee Bar-Sinai, Yehuda Greenfield-Gilat, and Aya Shapira designed a bus terminal that would sit on the seam of divided Jerusalem under an eventual peace deal.

The Jerusalem city engineer, intrigued, came to one of their reviews. He was not impressed. “He stood there in front of everyone and said, ‘You will never graduate. This is not architecture,’ ” Ms. Bar-Sinai recalls.

Not only did they graduate, she and Mr. Greenfield-Gilat started a firm – SAYA, or Studio Aya (after their classmate, killed in the Indonesia tsunami) – churning out designs that have become highly sought after.

US Ambassador Martin Indyk asked to see their plans, which have also been shared with top Israeli leaders – including some on the right. Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert even showed one design of a pedestrian crossing between the two halves of the city to his counterpart, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

While the pair see a divided city as more practical than an open one, at least at first, their designs incorporate an optimistic flexibility for progress. If border-crossing facilities became unnecessary down the line, for example, they could be turned into community centers.

After 10 years, Bar-Sinai, Greenfield-Gilat, and their team have produced detailed renderings of nearly every key challenge involved in dividing Jerusalem between Israel and the future Palestine.

They sketched out a natural barrier along the seam of the divided city, enhanced with electronic sensors and cameras and nicely landscaped – far more visually appealing than the concrete and barbed wire more common to Israel’s security infrastructure. They redesigned highway interchanges to create separate road networks between Jewish and Arab neighborhoods.

They even created an interactive online map for the S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace in Washington, where users can examine the patchwork of Jerusalem neighborhoods and experiment with drawing their own borders for the city.

Their proposals strive to create minimal disruption to the city’s fabric while ensuring high security. But their mission goes beyond design, to helping others reimagine a peaceful Jerusalem.

“It’s a philosophy,” says Greenfield-Gilat. “We’re involved in a whole sphere of activity that chose not to see this situation as unsolvable but ... as something we can overcome.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Building a shared Jerusalem: One design firm takes up the task
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today