Syria border bombing: How will Turkey respond if attacks continue?

Turkey has worried about Syria's war creeping across the border since the uprising began. Yesterday's bombing at a border crossing indicates it may finally be happening.

Gaia Anderson/AP
People and ambulances seen near the Cilvegozu customs gate at Turkey-Syria border near Reyhanli, Hatay, Turkey, Monday, minutes after a car bomb exploded.

A day after a bomb blast killed 14 people and injured dozens on Turkey’s border with Syria, it remains unclear who was behind the attack. But for Turkish officials, the bombing itself, not the culprit, is the real issue.

Turkey has worried about violence in Syria spilling over the border since the outset of the uprising. Already Syria and Turkey have exchanged artillery fire, and NATO recently placed Patriot surface-to-air missiles defense systems along the border at Turkey’s request. 

Yesterday’s bombing at the Bab al-Hawa border crossing, a major transit point for people and supplies moving in and out of opposition-controlled Syria, raises the question of how Turkey is likely to respond if terrorist-style attacks continue to happen on the border or potentially deeper inside the country.

“The bombing, regardless of the perpetrators, basically reinforces the anxiety in Ankara that the Syrian conflict has already spilled over into Turkey and could intensify and escalate with devastating consequences,” says Fawaz Gerges, director of the Middle East Center at the London School of Economics. “Since the Turkish foreign policy was based on Assad’s days being numbered, the longer the conflict continues, the greater the risk to Turkey.”

The blast occurred when a vehicle with Syrian license plates detonated at the crossing in the Turkish town of Reyhanli. The Turkish government has called the incident a terrorist attack, but said they were still investigating to determine who was behind it.

The opposition Syrian National Council claimed that some of their members crossing the border were the target of the attack, which they blamed on forces loyal to the government of President Bashar al-Assad. The Syrian side of the border there is controlled by the opposition, making it unclear how government loyalists could have infiltrated that deep. But there's also no obvious reason why opposition groups would conduct such an attack along the border, given the strong support Turkey has provided.

The uncertainty surrounding attacks like the Bab al-Hawa bombing underscore Turkey’s deepening concerns for its own stability as Syria’s conflict drags on.

The Syrian opposition, which has long struggled to present a unified front, is now at risk of fracturing even further, with many Syrians concerned that these tensions could eventually erupt into violence. This could be of particular concern to Turkey, which hosts members of the opposition along with more than 170,000 refugees.

“You don’t know who all these refugees are. You don’t know whether these people are members of the Nusra Front or opposition figures who are more acceptable to the West,” says Christopher Chivvis, a senior political scientist at Rand Corp., referencing Jabhat al-Nusra, an opposition group recently classified as a terrorist organization by the US.

“The refugee crisis is their primary concern. It’s a burden to begin with, for the cities to have to absorb these refugees,” adds Mr. Chivvis.

The more immediate concern of hosting tens of thousands of refugees is quickly becoming the economic cost. In recent remarks to the media, Turkey Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said his country has already spent $600 million housing and feeding Syrian refugees.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.