Israel faces off with African migrants on Egyptian border

A weeklong standoff between a group of Eritreans seeking entry to Israel and a get-tough Israeli government policy on African migrants ended today with the deportation of most of the Eritreans.

Ahikam Seri/AP
An Israeli soldier checks on African immigrants behind the newly-built fence at Israel-Egypt border, after they arrived a week earlier at the spot and got trapped between the old and new fences, Thursday.

A weeklong standoff between Eritrean asylum seekers trapped at the Israeli-Egyptian border and soldiers ordered to block their entry ended today, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu forced most of the Eritreans back to Egypt except for two women and a teenager.

The border standoff dramatized as never before Israel’s dilemma over how to stop the influx of tens of thousands of Africans fleeing repressive governments who are seeking illegal entry to Israel and the Jewish state’s collective memory as a nation built by refugees. Although similar border confrontations have occurred in the past, this was the first caught on camera. 

It was also a visceral test of Israel’s resolve to defend a newly built border fence for the express purpose of blocking militants and African migrants.

"This issue is very divisive. It goes to the roots of what it means to be a Jewish state," says Oren Persico, a columnist at the Seventh Eye, an Israeli media magazine.

Although the debate over the African migrants has gone on for most of this year, never before have Israelis watched a life-threatening confrontation play out at the border. "You got the sense that the media uproar could have changed the outcome," Mr. Persico says. 

Photographs showed a small group of Africans huddled under a tarp just outside the border fence while television footage showed soldiers blocking human rights workers seeking to provide food and medicines to the migrants, who they feared might perish after days of exposure in the desert. The media reported that one of the women suffered a miscarriage at the border.

Their plight was taken up by the Israeli Supreme Court in an emergency session today, but it adjourned until Sept. 9 with no decision.

The compromise – allowing the women and teenager to stay while sending back all the men – allowed Netanyahu to show his resolve to enforce a get-tough policy against the migrants, while allowing for humanitarian exceptions. The three who will be allowed to stay in Israel will be kept in a detention center.

"It is important that everyone will understand that Israel is not another destination for infiltrators," Mr. Netanyahu said in a statement, which noted that there has been a 90 percent drop in the arrivals. "We are determined to stop the deluge of infiltrators."

In recent years, tens of thousands of Africans, mostly from Sudan and Eritrea, have reached Israel by illegally crossing the border on foot from Egypt. Israel has given those from Sudan's Darfur region, a fraction of the total refugees, permanent residency, and the rest have been given provisional approvals to live and work in the country without being recognized as refugees, which means the state could swiftly revoke their status at any time.

Netanyahu has called the unchecked influx of African migrants a top national threat to Israel, claiming it threatens to erode the country’s Jewish majority and weaken the economy. He has tried to highlight efforts to reduce the number of asylum seekers arriving to play to public opinion, which supports blocking entry, and has even forced several hundred South Sudanese to leave the country.

His government has sponsored legislation permitting the Africans – which it considers migrant workers, not asylum seekers –  to be detained for three years, and is building a large detention center near the border for those who are caught crossing.

Israeli human rights advocates have argued that Israel has a moral and legal obligation to look after anyone who reaches its soil and to allow them to work. They have criticized Israel’s government for not considering giving them political asylum. 

Sigal Rozen, a spokeswoman at the Hotline for Migrant Workers, said the move to return the Africans to Egypt was a violation of international law. She argued that even though numbers of migrants are down after the construction of the fence, the barrier will not completely stop the flow.

"People will keep on coming," she says. "There will be some that will try their luck."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Israel faces off with African migrants on Egyptian border
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today