One kidnapping in Syria prompts kidnapping of 20-plus in Lebanon

Tit-for-tat kidnappings have ratcheted up tensions between Lebanon's Shiites, who largely back the Assad regime, and pro-opposition Sunnis.

Bilal Hussein/AP
Anti-Syrian regime protesters carry a giant Syrian revolutionary flag as they listen to Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir, unseen, a hardline Sunni Lebanese cleric, as he gives a sermon in support of Syrian opposition fighters and its allies in Lebanon, including Hezbollah, the powerful Shiite militant group, in Beirut, Lebanon, Friday, Aug. 10.

A series of tit-for-tat abductions this week of Shiite Lebanese and Sunni Syrians threatens to further undermine stability in Lebanon as the sectarian nature of the brutal conflict in Syria deepens and spreads.

Members of the Meqdad clan, a powerful Shiite tribe from the Bekaa Valley in eastern Lebanon, announced today that the the "military wing" of the family had abducted more than 20 Syrians in Lebanon whom they alleged were fighters with the rebel Free Syrian Army (FSA). The Meqdads said that the abductions were in response to the kidnapping, allegedly by the FSA, of Hassan Selim Meqdad in Damascus at the beginning of the week. The FSA accused Hassan Meqdad of being a member of Lebanon's militant Shiite group Hezbollah, a strong supporter of the Assad regime. Hezbollah and the Meqdad family have denied the claims, with the latter saying that he was an employee of a Lebanese bank.

"The family's military wing kidnapped several Syrians. We are not afraid of anyone," said Maher "Abu Ali" Meqdad, speaking on behalf of the family at a press conference in the Bourj al-Barajneh suburb of southern Beirut.

The Meqdad clan does not have a formal armed faction, although some members of the family do serve with Hezbollah and, like all Bekaa Valley clans, they are fierecly independent, live by strict tribal codes of honor and solidarity, and scorn the authority of the Lebanese state. It would be a rare Meqdad who does not own at least one gun.

Maher Meqdad said that a captain and a wounded man were among the hostages. All of the alleged FSA men were kidnapped in north Lebanon. Tensions have been building for months in north Lebanon between Sunni Lebanese who support the uprising against the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Shiite Lebanese who back the Assad regime.

Some Sunni villages strung along the northern border have become de facto safe havens for the FSA, with rebels slipping across the border at night to attack Syrian army positions. In retaliation, Syrian forces stage nightly bombardments of these Sunni villages to strike at rebel infiltrators and to punish the Lebanese for hosting the FSA.

Last week, clashes broke out between members of the Shiite Jaafar tribe and Sunni residents of the remote northern border town of Akroum. The Lebanese army deployed reinforcements in the mountainous area to help restore calm. In May, the abduction by the FSA of three Lebanese Shiites (one of them a Jaafar) who lived just inside Syria sparked a week of fighting and the retaliatory kidnapping by the Jaafars of more than 30 Syrians. The hostages were subsequently released in a prisoner swap.

But the tensions between Lebanese Shites and Sunnis are hardening as the conflict in Syria worsens.

"Everyone is getting ready for action. The mood here is really bad. This is going to get much worse," says a Shiite resident of southern Beirut who is close to the Meqdad family.

The Lebanese government, the majority of which is composed of allies of Damascus, has adopted a policy of disassociation with the crisis in neighboring Syria. However, there are indications that the government is beginning to distance itself from the Assad regime.

Last week, the Lebanese police detained and indicted a former Lebanese cabinet minister and close personal friend of Mr. Assad on charges of plotting a string of bomb attacks in north Lebanon at the request of the Syrian leadership. Ali Mamluk, a top Syrian security chief, was also indicted, an unprecedented step for a country that has long lived in the shadow of its powerful neighbor.

Still, the Lebanese government faces an uphill struggle to contain the spreading tensions in Lebanon and has little leverage against the powerful Bekaa Valley tribes like the Meqdads. Two weeks ago, the government was forced to suspend its annual program to eradicate hashish in the Bekaa due to fierce armed resistance by three of the most powerful tribes who had weeks earlier forged a mutual defense pact to protect their lucrative but illicit crops.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.