Timeline: Egypt's revolution

June 6, 2010: Khaled Said is beaten to death by police in Alexandria. Within days, a Facebook page titled 'We are all Khaled Said' is created, rallying public anger.

Dec. 17, 2010: Tunisian Mohamed Bouazizi ignites the Arab Spring.

2011

Jan. 25: Egyptians demand that President Hosni Mubarak step down.

Feb. 11: Mr. Mubarak is forced out; an interim military council (known as SCAF) takes power.

March 19: In the freest vote in half a century, 77 percent of Egyptians approve a revised constitution, paving the way for elections.

Aug. 1: The Army clears Tahrir Square after a month of protests, to the cheers of some.

Aug. 3: A trial opens against Mubarak, who is charged with corruption and killing protesters.

Sept. 9-12: SCAF expands the hated emergency law after protesters breach the Israeli embassy. Protesters say SCAF has become more repressive than Mubarak.

Oct. 9: More than two dozen, mostly Christians, are killed at a Cairo protest. Witnesses accuse the Army.

Nov. 19-21: Largest protests since uprising occur; military promises transition to civilian rule by July 2012.

Nov. 28-29: First round of parliamentary elections begins, eventually yielding an Islamist-dominated parliament.

2012

March 28: Liberals walk out in protest of the selection process for a 100-seat assembly that will write a new constitution; Islamists get a majority of the seats.

April 10: Court suspends the assembly.

May 23-24: First round of presidential elections; a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and Mubarak's former prime minister advance to a runoff vote.

May 31: The state of emergency ends after 31 years.

June 2: Mubarak sentenced to life in prison.

June 14-17: Court ruling leads to dissolution of parliament. Just as polls close in presidential runoff, SCAF makes an 11th-hour power grab that seems to end all pretense of a civilian transfer by July as promised.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.