Shimon Peres: a dovish voice in Obama's ear

Israeli President Shimon Peres meets with President Obama today. Mr. Peres opposes an Israeli preemptive strike on Iran, adding a dovish voice to deliberations between the US and Israel.

Cliff Owen/AP
Israeli President Shimon Peres addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Policy Conference's opening plenary session in Washington, Sunday. Shimon Peres will meet with President Obama as well, Sunday.

On the eve of a summit between President Barak Obama and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to close gaps on confronting Iran, Mr. Obama meets today with an Israeli elder statesman who has staked out a more dovish position than the government.

Israeli President Shimon Peres’ position is supposed to be ceremonial, but octogenarian Nobel Peace laureate has served as an envoy on behalf of Mr. Netanyahu. That hasn’t stopped him letting his personal views be known: A report in the Haaretz newspaper last week said he opposes an Israeli preemptive attack on Iran right now, even though many Israeli leaders have been hinting at the possibility. Opposing an attack now puts Mr. Peres closer to the US president than some Israeli cabinet members. 

The warm up presidential meeting on Sunday underscores the diversity of opinion in Israel on how to handle Iran, and shows that Israel's most famous diplomat is still a player on the international stage, even though he has no policy-making powers back at home.

"It's definitely a bully pulpit," says Mitchell Barak, a former aide to Peres. "President Peres has credibility but lacks the authority. And the prime minister has the authority but often lacks the credibility. So they are a good combination."

Before meeting Obama on Sunday, the Israeli President delivered the opening address of a convention of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). He was expected to say that there "no space" between the US and Israel on the desire to prevent Iran from gaining a nuclear weapon. He also planned to praise Obama for brining security cooperation with the Israel to its "highest level," according to a copy of his speech distributed before the address.

The remarks are aimed at reducing bilateral tensions amid reports of friction between Netanyahu and Obama over just how to block Iran from gaining a nuclear weapon. Israel is reportedly lobbying the US to be more explicit about a potential strike against Iran.

In addition to Peres, several former Israeli security chiefs like former Mossad director Meir Dagan have expressed concern about the consequences of an Israeli lone attack.  

Peres served as Israel's prime minister in the 1980s and briefly in the 1990s. He was a disciple of Israel's founding Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion and served alongside Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, who was assassinated in 1995. Peres is seen as the architect of Israel's peace accords with the Palestinians for which he, Mr. Rabin, and Yasser Arafat won the Nobel Peace Prize.

In the recent past Peres has served as a mediator between the Israeli prime minister and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Given the history of strained meetings between Netanyahu and Obama over the peace negotiations, the Israeli president is probably trying to make a final effort to ensure that the summit is a success, Barak said.

But once the meeting today is over, Peres will revert to his ceremonial role and is expected to leave Washington to clear the stage for Netanyahu and the US president to get down to business.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.