An app pushes factories in China to cut pollution

Environmentalist Ma Jun built a mobile phone app that lets users see whether a Chinese factory or power plant is violating pollution standards. His efforts won him a $1.25 million prize from the Skoll World Forum on Entrepreneurship.

Kim Kyung-Hoon/Reuters/File
Yong Xiaoyan puts on a mask at her office in Beijing in December 2014. The office worker said she has used the mask, intended to filter out tiny particles of pollution, every day since she found out she was pregnant. Awareness of the poor quality of Beijing's air is on the rise, thanks to a growing amount of data.

When environmentalist Ma Jun set out to tackle pollution from Chinese industries, it seemed a near-impossible task.

Taking polluting factories to court was difficult. Factory owners were powerful, and the incentives were stronger to cut environmental corners than comply with regulations.

But China's government, worried about public anger over worsening pollution, had begun collecting real-time emissions data from factories and when Ma asked for water pollution data be made public, officials agreed, giving him fodder for an app.

"I was very surprised when the government said yes," he said at the Skoll World Forum on Entrepreneurship, where he was awarded a $1.25 million prize. "This is a clear sign of the political will of the central government to solve the environmental problem," he said.

Using the data, Ma's Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs (IPE) built a mobile phone app that lets users see on an hourly basis whether a factory or power plant near their home is violating pollution standards.

It has been downloaded by 3 million people in China.

Violations pop up as a red square on a map and can be tagged on social media, often to the local environment agency's account on Sina Weibo, a popular Chinese hybrid of Facebook and Twitter.

As a result, factories that used to pay fines year after year are facing new sources of pressure, Ma said.

The IPE also brought the violations to the attention of multinational companies such as Apple, Gap, and Uniqlo, which source products from the offending factories. Within a month of contacting the first 29 companies, 28 agreed to act, Ma said.

"At the beginning, [factories] were resistant," Ma said.

But as growing numbers of buyers told them their contracts were at risk, that changed.

"They decided it was time to fix it," he said.

Today, more than 1,800 factories and 120 international firms have taken steps to reduce pollution because of public pressure brought about by the app, Ma said.

Using additional air pollution data now included in the app, 380 cities in China can check their air quality hourly.

Wang Bidou of the Shandong Environmental Protection Bureau said letting the public use real-time data to hold polluters to account was "a warning to all of the 15,000 companies on the pollution map."

The eastern China province, a heavy coal user, has been one of the most active provinces in addressing pollution, Ma said.

Ma said the success of Beijing-based IPE's initiative has helped the Chinese government become more confident about transparency and pollution control.

Since agreeing to release water pollution monitoring data, the government has opened access to emissions data from state-owned enterprises, steel companies, and coal-fired power plants.

This year, a new environmental protection law came into effect that for the first time gives people the right to know about, participate in, and supervise environmental efforts.

Providing citizens with access to real-time company emissions data puts China ahead of most other nations, Ma noted.

Taking on China's polluters has not been easy. When violations are pointed out, some factory owners "are in a very bad mood, some are threatening," Ma said.

But several things helped his project, including the fact that its data is based on government monitoring.

"We are looking for a solution. We don't want to destroy them ... This is about helping transform our economy," he said.

(Editing by Megan Rowling and Belinda Goldsmith)

This article originally appeared at Thomson Reuters Foundation, a source of news, information, and connections for action. It provides programs that trigger change, empower people, and offer concrete solutions. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.