Brown at 60: a civil rights landmark

The Supreme Court's 1954 ruling Brown v. Board of Education overturned the idea of 'separate but equal' and became 'the opening salvo' of the civil rights movement, says African-American legal scholar Sherrilyn Ifill.

|
Courtesy of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund
'The problem is that it's very hard for people to hold these two truths in their head at the same time," says NAACP LDF president Sherrilyn Ifill. 'One, that we have made extraordinary progress on race....[And] two, we have a long way still to go.'

Tomorrow (May 17) marks 60 years since what was perhaps the most important Supreme Court decision of the 20th century, Brown v. Board of Education.

Today only older Americans can remember when segregation was the law of the land. In 1954 the Brown decision overturned the "separate but equal" concept that had been established in 1896 in the Court's Plessy v. Ferguson ruling.

On the Brown anniversary, says Sherrilyn Ifill, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund (LDF), Americans should both celebrate the progress the decision represents and recognize that the job isn't finished.

"The problem is that it's very hard for people to hold these two truths in their head at the same time," Ms. Ifill says. "One, that we have made extraordinary progress on race and opened up opportunity and access to so many people who were marginalized in the past. [And] two, we have a long way still to go."

The Brown decision was the result of two decades of work by many African American legal scholars, most notably Charles Hamilton Houston, dean of the law school at Howard University, and Thurgood Marshall, who would become the first head of the LDF and later a Supreme Court justice.

After the Civil War African Americans were still second-class citizens despite the words of the 14th amendment in 1868 promising equal protection under the law. In the 1896 Supreme Court decision Plessy v. Ferguson state laws mandating "separate but equal" treatment of the races were found legal.

But "state-sponsored segregation could never be equal," Ifill says. The Brown decision rejected it.

"It was an acknowledgement that segregation was not so that black and whites could flourish in their own communities," Ifill says. "It was created for the purpose of subordinating the black population. And the court recognized that in Brown."

Today, she says, "We take for granted the world that Brown ushered in, a diverse world in which many of us [of different races] work and live and interact. I don't think we have a black president without Brown."

Brown became "the opening salvo" of the civil rights movement, she pointed out in a recent telephone interview, "ushering in a period that forever changes this country. And we take it for granted now because we have expectations of equality, we have expectations of diversity.

"Of course there's still inequality. Of course there's still segregation, particularly in housing. But the reality is that our expectations have forever been changed because of Brown."

Today Supreme Court decisions are tending to return more power to the states. "It's worth remembering that the reason the states were cautioned about their power by the 14th amendment was because of their failure" to protect the rights of minorities, Ifill says.

One lessons we've learned since Brown is that those people who resisted integration "were wrong about the future of America, and what would keep America strong and make America strong," she says.

Ifill is too young to have experienced the early civil rights movement. But growing up in New York she had "a very socially conscious father," she recalls. "There were several newspapers in my home every day."

She sometimes wondered if she had missed the best moments of the movement. But as she grew older the idea of working inside the legal system to address wrongs seemed "so subversive and delicious. I wanted to be a part of it from the time I was a little girl."

As a young lawyer she worked at the American Civil Liberties Union and at LDF. She then spent 20 years teaching at the University of Maryland law school before rejoining LDF in 2012.

Is the goal now, she is asked, for the LDF to put itself out of business, to no longer be necessary?

"Absolutely. Absolutely. Absolutely," Ifill says. "Unfortunately, it doesn't look like that time is upon us. But that's the goal, to not need this.

"We feel proud of the success [of the LDF] but we feel very, very challenged by the work that is yet to come."

• The NAACP LDF website has a special "Brown at 60" section with more background on the Brown V. Board of Education decision. Visit it at http://www.naacpldf.org/brown-at-60

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Brown at 60: a civil rights landmark
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Making-a-difference/Change-Agent/2014/0516/Brown-at-60-a-civil-rights-landmark
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe