Ninety percent of kids give to charity

Children whose parents talk to them about giving are 20 percent more likely to give than those whose parents don’t, a recent study finds.

Mario Anzuoni/Reuters/File
Two children play in an outdoor fountain during a hot day in Pasadena, Calif. Children can learn to give to charities, especially if their parents talk with them about giving.

Nine out of 10 children give money to charity, according to a study released Sept. 12.

While some just give pennies, the efforts that parents and others are making to encourage giving show that charities would benefit by doing more to start early to nurture future generations of donors, says Debra Mesch, director of Indiana University’s Women’s Philanthropy Institute and one of the authors of the report.

Children whose parents talk to them about giving are 20 percent more likely to give than those whose parents don’t, she said, a finding that she says charities should let their supporters know.

“Parents today, especially women, are very interested in leaving a giving legacy,” says Ms. Mesch. “So charities should think about how they can involve more families in these kinds of discussions and in volunteering for an organization, or involving the children in the charity of the parents.”

The report, by the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy at Indiana University and the United Nations Foundation used data from a decades-long study of 903 American children from age 8 to 19. The children’s giving behavior was tracked during two 12-month periods, from 2002 to 2003 and from 2007 to 2008.

Among the findings:

  • Giving rates among boys and girls were the same, but girls were much more likely to volunteer: Forty-nine percent of girls had given their time at least once, compared with 39 percent of boys.
  • While children from households at all income levels gave, children from the most affluent households—those with $72,000 or more in income—were most likely to give. Sixty-one percent of kids in the highest-income homes gave in both years, compared with 56 percent in middle-income households and 44 percent in families that made less than $38,000.

This article originally appeared on the website of The Chronicle of Philanthropy.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.