Netanyahu says UN should scrap Gaza war probe by 'anti-Israeli body'

The UN commission chief, Canadian law professor William Schabas, resigned Monday following an official Israeli complaint that he was biased against the country.

Gali Tibbon/AP
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu chairs the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem, Sunday, Feb. 1, 2015.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called Tuesday for scrapping a UN commission, which is tasked with investigating potential war crimes committed last summer in Gaza, after the inquiry's chief resigned amid accusations from Israel that he was biased against the country.

Mr. Netanyahu said the commission, set up by the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council, was an "anti-Israeli body" that had a proven track record of doing nothing about true human rights violations around the world.

The UN commission is due to issue its report next month. Israel did not cooperate with it, saying it was hostile to Israel and that its conclusions were known in advance.

The summer's war in Gaza, the third between Israel and Hamas since the group seized the seaside territory, killed more than 2,200 Palestinians and 72 people on the Israeli side. At least 1,483 Palestinian civilians were killed in the war — 66 percent of the overall death toll — according to preliminary United Nations figures.

The UN commission chief, Canadian law professor William Schabas, submitted his resignation Monday night, according to Rolando Gomez, a spokesman for the Rights Council.

The move followed an official Jan. 30 complaint from Israel accusing Mr. Schabas of "clear and documented bias against Israel," citing a "contractual relationship with the Palestinian side" prior to becoming head of the commission.

In his resignation letter, which was viewed by The Associated Press, Schabas acknowledged that he received $1,300 for a legal opinion he wrote for the Palestine Liberation Organization in 2012 but said it was of a "technical legal nature" drawn from scholarly work he had published.

He also defended his record, saying that as a "scholar involved in international human rights, I have regularly condemned perpetrators of violations."

"This work in defense of human rights appears to have made me a huge target for malicious attacks," Schabas wrote, adding that he was resigning to avoid any distractions while the commission finished its "decisive stage" of work.

Pressure aimed at 'killing the truth'

The commission's final report is scheduled to be presented March 23.

After his appointment last year, Schabas said he wouldn't let his past criticism of Israeli leaders affect his ability to carry out the investigation. But in Israel he was widely regarded as having a distinct anti-Israel bent.

Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum said Schabas' resignation "shows the huge pressure Israel and the Zionist lobby put on the committee and its chairman."

The Israeli pressure "is meant for impunity and killing the truth," Mr. Barhoum said.

Mr. Gomez told the AP over the telephone from Geneva that Joachim Ruecker, the UN council's president, is now in discussions with the other two members of the inquiry on appointing a successor to Schabas.

The UN council's president "appreciates that in this way even the appearance of a conflict of interest is avoided," added Gomez.

UN rights council's record questioned

Netanyahu has accused the UN commission of unfairly targeting Israel and ignoring abuses elsewhere.

"This is the same council that in 2014 made more decisions against Israel than against Iran, Syria and North Korea combined," Netanyahu said, adding that Gaza's Hamas rulers "need to be investigated, not Israel."

The 47-member council, which includes several Arab and Muslim-majority countries, has a record of passing more resolutions condemning Israel's alleged abuses than those of other states. The practice has been criticized as excessive by Israel's allies, including the United States, which nevertheless supports the council's overall work.

Israel says it went to great lengths to avoid civilian casualties during the summer war in Gaza and accuses Hamas of both firing rockets at Israeli civilians and using its own people as human shields.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.