UK's Theresa May seeks TV, social media ban on extremists views

Britain's Home Secretary Theresa May told a conference of the governing Conservatives that if re-elected next year, the party will introduce civil powers to disrupt people who 'spread poisonous hatred' even within the law.

Luke MacGregor/Reuters
Britain's Home Secretary Theresa May speaks at the Conservative Party Conference in Birmingham, central England, September 30, 2014.

Britain's interior minister on Tuesday proposed new powers to bar people with extremist views from appearing on television or publishing on social media, even if they are not breaking any laws.

Home Secretary Theresa May told a conference of the governing Conservatives that if re-elected next year, the party will introduce civil powers to disrupt people who "spread poisonous hatred" even within the law.

Under the proposal, police could apply for a court order to disrupt "harmful activity" by restricting an individual's movements, preventing them from speaking in public or stopping them publishing articles online.

May said that only a minority of extremists are violent, but "the damage that extremists cause to our society is reason enough to act."

May said that at least 500 Britons have traveled to fight with Islamic militants in Syria and Iraq, and tough measures are needed to stop young people becoming radicalized.

She said the proposed rules could be used against neo-Nazis and other radicals as well as Islamic extremists.

The proposals will be included in the Conservatives' election platform, but are not guaranteed to become law. The Conservatives' coalition partners, the centrist Liberal Democrats, scuttled an earlier bill to give police and spy agencies wide powers to snoop on email traffic, Internet browsing and social media sites.

Civil libertarians — including some Conservatives — said May's anti-extremism proposals were repressive and potentially counterproductive.

A ban on leaders of the Irish Republican Army-linked Sinn Fein party appearing on radio and television in the 1980s and '90s led to their words being spoken by actors and is now widely seen as ineffective.

Conservative lawmaker David Davis, speaking to the BBC, cautioned against "forgetting what we're defending."

"We're defending a liberal democracy, one in which you can say all sorts of things," Davis said.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to