Iran's parliament speaker warns negotiators against concessions

Iran's parliament speaker said elected representatives would not permit 'special measures,' like U.N. monitoring and inspection to be imposed on the country. Support from Iran's parliament and the US Congress is key for both sides as nuclear negotiations continue. 

Salvatore Di Nolfi/AP
Iran's Parliament speaker Ali Larijani listens to a question during a press conference on the sidelines of the 129th Assembly of the Inter-Parliamentary Union in Geneva, Switzerland, Oct. 9. On Sunday, Larijani reminded Iranian and US negotiators that Iran's parliament could intervene in nuclear talks.

Iran's parliament speaker warned Sunday that lawmakers could intervene in ongoing nuclear talks with calls for stepped up atomic work if the West presses too hard for concessions.

The message from Ali Larijani — less than a week after talks resumed — appears aimed at both envoys from the West and Iran's negotiation team, which is led by Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. It also highlights the political jockeying inside Iran between backers of moderate-leaning President Hassan Rouhani and hard-liners wary of his outreach to Washington.

Larijani's comments follow appeals by some members of the US Congress to tighten sanctions on Iran despite the nuclear negotiations and historic diplomatic breakthroughs last month, including President Barack Obama's telephone chat with Rouhani. Larijani, meanwhile, told Iran's representatives that parliament would not permit world powers to impose "special measures" on the country beyond the obligations laid out by the U.N. treaty overseeing nuclear activity, such as U.N. monitoring and inspection.

Iran's ruling clerics approve all major policies and decisions, but parliament holds enough clout to potentially disrupt talks in response to Western demands to curb the program. Such resistance from Iran's parliament could throw doubts on Rouhani's ability to strike a deal with world powers in the same way that protests in Congress could stand in the way of potentially easing sanctions.

Details from last week's talks have remained tightly guarded, but short-range priorities have been made clear. The US and allies seek to roll back Iran's highest-level uranium enrichment, which is several steps away from weapons grade. Iran wants the West to start withdrawing sanctions, which have hit Iran's vital oil exports.

The next round for talks is scheduled in Geneva for Nov. 7-8 between Iran and a six-nation group, the permanent U.N. Security Council members and Germany. The West and others fear that Iran could eventually produce a nuclear weapon. Iran insists it only seeks reactors for energy and medical use.

The semiofficial Fars news agency quoted Larijani as saying that Iran's nuclear program cannot be pushed beyond the requirements of the U.N.'s nuclear non-proliferation treaty, or NPT, which Iran has signed.

"Iranian negotiators should be fully aware of this," Larijani said. "If parliament feels another powerful party has a double-standard and unjustifiable attitudes, it will approve necessary measures on amount and diversity of nuclear activities."

Larijani did not elaborate, but said there is "no room for trust" yet with the US.

On Saturday, Iran's deputy foreign minister and one of Iran's nuclear negotiators, Abbas Araghchi, told state TV that Washington holds a "main part of the responsibility in the confidence-building process" — which he described as a "correction" of past policies that include sanctions.

Rouhani, meanwhile, told the Swiss ambassador in Tehran to "convey the good intentions of Iran to the American side." Switzerland represents US diplomatic interests in Iran, whose ties with Washington were severed after the storming of the US Embassy in late 1979.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.