The war against Islamic extremists in Mali is won, says French President Francois Hollande

During a speech in Mali, Francois Hollande declared victory in the war against Islamic extremists in the country, while promising to keep French troops on the ground as long as an extremist threat exists. 

Thierry Gouegnon/ Reuters
French President Francois Hollande speaks at the inauguration ceremony of Mali's new president, Ibrahim Boubacar Keita, at the Stade du 26 Mars stadium in Bamako, Mali, Sept. 19, 2013.

French President François Hollande declared Thursday the war against Islamic extremists had been won in Mali, though he vowed to keep French forces in the West African country as long as the threat exists.

Mr. Hollande spoke before more than a dozen heads of state at inauguration festivities for Malian President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita, who overwhelmingly won the election that France urged Mali to hold only months after the radical jihadists had been largely ousted from power in northern Mali.

"We have won this war; we have chased out the terrorists; we have secured the north and finally ... we have, you have organized an uncontested election and the winner is now the president of Mali," Hollande told the crowd gathered at a sports stadium in the Malian capital.

"If there had not been an intervention, today the terrorists would be here in Bamako," he said.

Later at a news conference held in Mali's capital, Hollande pledged that French forces would continue to aid the Malian military "so long as the threat exists." He also vowed to continue pursuing the six French hostages who are being held by Al Qaeda's North Africa branch.

"We should seek to do all that we can to liberate them," he said.

Several Islamic militant groups were able to seize control of northern Mali in the aftermath of a March 2012 coup in the distant capital of Bamako. Once in power, they instituted their harsh interpretation of Islamic sharia (Islamic law), meting out amputations and whippings as punishments and forcing women to wear veils in public.

As they threatened to push farther south, France launched a military operation in January that was joined by soldiers from a number of neighboring countries. The jihadists retreated from major centers in the north including Timbuktu and Gao.

However, some analysts cast doubt on Hollande's claim of victory.

There are "persistent reports that jihadists have either started filtering back into Mali or never left," said Andrew Lebovich, an analyst who focuses on political and security issues in the Sahel and North Africa.

"While the French intervention reversed the jihadist push south, significantly degraded the capacity of regional terrorist groups to operate in Mali, and killed or scattered a large number of fighters and commanders, it is a stretch to say that the war is won," he said.

Hollande also addressed questions Thursday about why France had intervened militarily in Mali but not in Syria. Mali's president had asked for French help, Hollande said, adding: "Each situation is different."

Mr. Keita formally took the oath of office two weeks ago as was required by the country's Constitution. On Thursday, Malians in their finest suits and traditional gowns poured into a sports stadium for the festivities, fanning themselves with programs in the heat and shading themselves with umbrellas.

The new president entered the stadium standing in the back of a military jeep draped in Malian flags, wearing a yellow sash accented in the other colors of the national flag — red and green. Throngs of soldiers ran alongside his vehicle, holding hands to form a barricade against well-wishers approaching him.

Keita spent much of his speech thanking regional leaders for their help in dislodging the extremists, and pledged to restore Mali's democratic institutions that were battered by the coup and the months of chaos that followed.

"The path will be long, but we will get there with the participation of all Malians," he said.

Keita emerged from a field of 28 candidates to an overwhelming win in the August presidential runoff election, taking nearly 78 percent of the vote in the second round.

Among his greatest challenges will be resolving the simmering secular separatist rebellion in the northern region of Kidal. Ethnic Tuaregs there have sought sovereignty ever since Mali's independence from France in 1960 and their latest rebellion last year gained momentum in the power vacuum after the coup. While they were temporarily sidelined during the rule of the radical jihadists, the Tuareg separatists are now largely back in control of Kidal and the return of the Malian military remains deeply unpopular.

Talks are set to begin within two months' time between Keita's new government and the group known as the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad, the name rebels use to describe their homeland.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.