Brit EU exit a disaster that won't happen: Dutch PM at Davos

France and Germany say Brits can't be EU member entirely on their own terms. But a day after British PM Cameron's electric speech that a 'Brexit,' a British departure from the EU bloc, could go to a referendum, Mark Rutte of the Netherlands is more sympathetic. 

|
Pascal Lauener/REUTERS
The Netherlands Prime Minister Mark Rutte speaks during the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, January 24, 2013.

Mark Rutte, the center-right, free-market Dutch head of state said he supported many of the goals that British Prime Minister David Cameron set out for renegotiating London's relationship with the 27-nation EU in a landmark speech on Wednesday.

"Britain has to be in the European Union, (it's) in Britain's interest and also in the European interest," Mr. Rutte told Reuters Insider television in an interview today at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Asked what would happen if Britain left, the Dutch leader said: "I'm not very worried that it will happen. I think it would be a disaster if it did happen. But I don't think it will happen."

Opinion polls suggest a slim majority of Britons would vote to leave the EU, a move now called a "Brexit," if a referendum were held today.

Rutte, one of Cameron's main allies in seeking more free trade and market liberalisation, said he agreed with Britain on many issues and he knew that Cameron also wanted Britain to remain an active member of the EU.

Europe needed to reform, he said, not to do special favours to one country, but to act in its own interest. It needed to restore economic competitiveness, reduce the costs of running the Union and focus on subsidiarity, the principle of taking decisions at the lowest level of government possible.

"I'm in agreement on all these issues. There might be a difference if at the end of the day David Cameron were to opt for particular opt-outs that he would ask for the UK," Rutte said.

"I don't believe you should have unique individual arrangements between individual countries and the EU, but we have to have this debate on subsidiarity."

Other European leaders have reacted more negatively to Cameron's pledge to negotiate a "new settlement with Europe" and then hold an in-out referendum on British membership of the bloc by the end of 2017, if his party is re-elected to government.

French and German leaders said Britain could not cherry-pick European policies or choose a-la-carte which areas of cooperation it wished to remain in.

Britain has already opted out of the euro single currency and the Schengen zone of passport-free travel and has indicated it will opt out of a swathe of justice and police cooperation legislation next year, including the common European arrest warrant, which replaced cumbersome extradition procedures for serious crimes and terrorism cases.

Rutte said the EU should focus on areas where it added value like completing its internal market, concluding new free trade agreements with the United States and Japan, opening up its energy market and allowing complete freedom to provide services across borders in the bloc.

Cameron and Rutte met briefly in the corridors of Davos and the British leader also met German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has taken a more cautious line towards his speech than other German politicians who were more negative.

(Reporting by Axel Threlfall; Writing by Paul Taylor; Editing by Jon Hemming)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Brit EU exit a disaster that won't happen: Dutch PM at Davos
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Latest-News-Wires/2013/0124/Brit-EU-exit-a-disaster-that-won-t-happen-Dutch-PM-at-Davos
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe