Who’s behind the attacks in Dhaka, Bangladesh?

The attack is the latest in a string carried out by local Islamic militants, though authorities deny the existence of operational ties to international terror groups.

|
Mohammd Ponir Hossain/Reuters
Army soldiers atop an armored military vehicle drive near the Holey Artisan restaurant after Islamist militants attacked the cafe in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

At least 20 people were killed on Saturday in the Bangladeshi capital of Dhaka after Islamist militants stormed the Holey Artisan, an upscale bakery and restaurant frequented by foreigners. Some 13 others were rescued by paramilitary forces, who killed six of the attackers and captured a seventh during a 12-hour standoff, according to Bangladeshi authorities.

The Islamic State (IS) claimed responsibility for the attack, although their claim has not yet been independently confirmed.

According to survivor reports, the attackers ordered Bangladeshis to stand before carrying out attacks with machetes and other sharp objects. Among the dead were Italian and Japanese citizens, according to NBC News, while another Japanese person and two Sri Lankans counted among those rescued. No Americans are believed to have been victimized, although three of the dead were students at American universities.

The mass targeting of foreigners in an affluent district known as a diplomatic zone is likely to cast a chill on an expatriate community formed mostly around the world’s second-largest garment industry.

The incident also represents one of the most brutal episodes in a string of attacks by Islamic extremists in Bangladesh against foreigners, LGBT activists, religious minorities, and others perceived as secular or liberal.

IS and its rival Al Qaeda often claim responsibility for the attacks when they occur, but Bangladeshi authorities deny that those groups’ international leaders coordinate with local militants on such operations. Officials place blame on two local groups: Ansar-al-Islam, which pledges allegiance to Al Qaeda, and Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen, which claims affiliation with IS.

Those groups originally grew from volunteers who fought the Soviet Union in its Afghan war, according to a February report from the Terrorism Research Initiative, an umbrella network of experts. In the years following that war’s end in 1992, many of those volunteers came home and established bases in the country’s northwest, from which they carried out attacks domestically.

Western officials have expressed concern over the possibility that recent incidents reflect growing cooperation between local militants and their international affiliates. But as the New York Times noted in May, no such attacks occurred between 2005 and 2014.

Recent incidents may have more secular causes: since taking power in 2014, the ruling Awami League has dedicated itself to a violent crackdown against its political opposition, one that has distracted the state from anti-terrorism security work and “allowed violent radicals of all stripes to let loose,” wrote the Times.

The attack's other victims included two Bangladeshi policemen, a former art gallery owner, family members of local business executives, an Indian citizen, and at least nine Italians, according to authorities in those countries. 

This report contains material from Reuters and the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Who’s behind the attacks in Dhaka, Bangladesh?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2016/0702/Who-s-behind-the-attacks-in-Dhaka-Bangladesh
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe