Ethiopia, Eritrea trade accusations over border incident

Ethiopia confirmed its military had responded to an attempted border attack by neighbor Eritrea.

REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya
A general view shows palm trees along the main street of Eritrea's capital Asmara, February 20, 2016.

 Ethiopia and Eritrea are trading accusations over an incident in a disputed border area, with Ethiopia on Monday confirming its military had taken "proportional measures" against Eritrea in response to an attempted attack in the Tsorona area the day before.

"The attack heavily weakened Eritrean military's attacking capacity," Ethiopia's Communications Affairs Office said.

In a statement late Sunday, Eritrea's Information Ministry accused Ethiopian troops of carrying out attacks against Eritrean positions in the Tsorona Central Front.

The two countries have been in a stalemate since the end in 2000 of a border war in which tens of thousands of people were killed. The countries do not have diplomatic relations and have accused each other of training and deploying banned armed groups.

Relatives of people who live in the Tsorona area said their families were fleeing following heavy shelling early Sunday.

"My father lives in the area and told me by phone of heavy shelling in the area," Yared Tewolde said. "One heavy artillery shell has landed very close to a school, and this has scared many."

Charlotte King, an analyst with the Economist Intelligence Unit, said accusations of direct attacks by the two countries are relatively rare.

"It is also unusual for the Eritrean government to comment on violent outbreaks," she said, adding that Eritrea may be trying to divert international attention away from a U.N. commission's report released last week that accused the government of widespread crimes against humanity.

In New York, the spokesman for the U.N. chief, Stephane Dujarric, said Ban Ki-moon urged both sides to "exercise maximum restraint."

Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn recently told The Associated Press that his forces will act against Eritrea if Ethiopia is provoked. He called the Eritrean government an "arrogant and very stubborn regime."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Ethiopia, Eritrea trade accusations over border incident
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today