Canadian lawmakers divided on assisted suicide

Some assisted suicide proponents say the proposal is too restrictive, while some health care providers say the bill would force them to work against their beliefs.

Adrian Wyld /The Canadian Press/AP
Canada's Health Minister Jane Philpott (r.) speaks as Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould listens at a news conference in Ottawa on Thursday. Canada has introduced a new assisted suicide law that will only apply to Canadians and residents.

Canada could soon legalize physician-assisted suicides for patients "enduring physical or psychological suffering," becoming one of the few countries to legalize some form the practice.

The proposed legislation will only apply to Canadian citizens and residents that are eligible to participate in the national health care system, meaning that tourists and other visitors who may wish to seek the assistance in Canada won't be able to. 

"It's a deeply personal issue that affects all of us and our families and all of us individually as we approach the end of our lives," said Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, as Reuters reported. "The plan we have put forward is one that respects Canadians' choices while putting in place the kinds of safeguards needed."

Under the proposed legislation, patients with "serious and incurable illness" would have to write a formal request or have a designated person write one for them. The request would need an approval from two independent physicians, and it would have a 15-day waiting period, during which the patient may withdraw the request. Physicians whose beliefs don't align with the law may refuse to provide the service, but they must refer patients to another physician.

The practice had been illegal in Canada, carrying a sentence of up to 14 years in prison, as The Washington Post reported. The county's Supreme Court established last year that Canadians have a constitutional right to receive physician-assisted suicide under certain circumstances, dealing a defeat to the Conservative government that was in power at the time. 

The legislation will be put to vote in June and is expected to pass as the Liberal government, which sponsored it, holds a majority of seats in Parliament. It remains a controversial bill, however, even though the vast majority of Canadians are in favor of assisted suicide, according to a 2014 Ipsos Reid poll. Some 84 percent of Canadians say they agree that doctors should be able to assist terminally ill patients to end their lives if certain conditions are met.

Although designed to discourage "suicide tourism" in Canada, some proponents of the law say the proposal is too restrictive, contending that it excludes people who may be suffering from early dementia as well as some minors who may be capable of making their own decisions.

"It's disappointing because if the government doesn't amend the legislation, when it comes into law, then we may see a number of court challenges from very sick and dying people to establish their charter right," Shanaaz Gokool, chief executive officer of Dying With Dignity Canada, told The Wall Street Journal.

But critics of the law who have long opposed any form of assisted suicide by often citing religious beliefs continue to push against the measure.

"It changes our approach to human life, it changes our approach to human society," Cardinal Thomas Collins, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Toronto, told The New York Times in an interview Thursday after the new bill was introduced.  

If approved, the new law will add Canada to a list of countries that allow some form of physician-assisted suicide, including Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, Luxembourg, Colombia, and the Netherlands. Physician-assisted suicide in the United States is legal in the states of California, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.