Mother Teresa to be made a saint, though not everyone will celebrate

Pope Francis announced Tuesday that Mother Teresa will be canonized in September. While many throughout the world will be overjoyed, there are those who take a more cynical view.

AP/File
In this Aug. 25, 1993 file photo Mother Teresa, head of Missionaries of Charity, is photographed, in New Delhi, India.

Mother Teresa will become a saint on Sept. 4th, Pope Francis announced Tuesday.

The announcement has been expected ever since December, when the Pope approved a second miracle attributed to Mother Teresa, and it will mark something of a centerpiece in Francis’s yearlong efforts to focus attention on the merciful nature of the Catholic church.

Many will celebrate this recognition of the work and life of Nobel Laureate Mother Teresa, but there are those who question the near-universal praise bestowed upon her.

“Mother Teresa's life was driven by a passion to build lives through forgiveness, healing, giving them respect and through making them true human beings in the image and likeness of God,” the archbishop of Ranchi, India, told the Vatican-affiliated AsiaNews.

Born in 1910 in what is now the Republic of Macedonia, Mother Teresa was famed for her foundation of the Order of the Missionaries of Charity, a group of Roman Catholic women dedicated to the destitute, particularly in India.

She left home to become a nun at the age of 18, spent 17 years teaching at a high school in Calcutta, and then received permission from her superiors in the convent school to go and work directly with the “poorest of the poor” in the slums.

At the time of her passing in 1997, Mother Teresa’s order consisted of hundreds of centers in more than 90 countries, with 4,000 nuns and hundreds of thousands of lay workers, and in her lifetime she was awarded numerous awards, none more famous than the Nobel Peace Prize, in 1979.

Yet even in her acceptance speech for this accolade, the revered nun courted controversy, offering her thoughts on the subject of Bosnian women who sought abortions after they were raped by Serbs:

“I feel the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a direct war, a direct killing – direct murder by the mother herself.”

The centers that she founded to care for the poor also drew criticism, described by some as unhygienic places where the sick went to find medical care, but found squalid conditions.

“Mother Teresa was not a friend of the poor. She was a friend of poverty. She said that suffering was a gift from God,” wrote Christopher Hitchens, perhaps her best-known detractor. “She spent her life opposing the only known cure for poverty, which is the empowerment of women and the emancipation of them from a livestock version of compulsory reproduction.”

Skepticism abounds regarding the veracity of the miracles attributed to Mother Teresa, as well as the way in which the first step towards sainthood, termed “beatification”, was fast-tracked after her death, waiving the normal five-year wait period.

A group of researchers from the University of Montreal and the University of Ottawa undertook exhaustive research in 2013 on the literature surrounding Mother Teresa, leading them to become increasingly skeptical and lament the lack of journalistic rigor surrounding the nun’s exploits.

Yet they also offered the following conclusion:

“If the extraordinary image of Mother Teresa conveyed in the collective imagination has encouraged humanitarian initiatives that are genuinely engaged with those crushed by poverty, we can only rejoice.

“It is likely that she has inspired many humanitarian workers whose actions have truly relieved the suffering of the destitute and addressed the causes of poverty and isolation without being extolled by the media.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.