China responds to Taiwan’s election results with hostile messages

As of Thursday morning, thousands had flooded President-elect Tsai’s Facebook page with pro-China comments.

Wally Santana/AP/File
Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party, DPP, presidential candidate, Tsai Ing-wen, raises her fist as she declares victory in the presidential election in Taipei, Taiwan

China is not happy with Tsai Ing-wen, the president-elect of Taiwan.

Almost a week after the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) leader was elected, netizens of mainland China launched a Facebook campaign to counter the pro-Taiwan independence sentiments shared on social media.

As of Thursday morning, Facebook users had flooded Ms. Tsai’s Facebook page with more than 40,000 comments. Foreign sites including Facebook, Twitter, Google, and others are blocked in mainland China. But users found ways to surpass the Great Firewall, the country’s vast network of censors and spying technology used to control Internet traffic, through VPN software.

"Taiwan is such a poor and backward place, do you still have any face to talk?” a user commented, according to the Washington Post. “What is the use of talking about this without any power? Do you have a say in the international community? If you have guts, declare independence."

The campaign was organized by Liyi Ba, an online community with more than 20 million members, and targeted pages of more than 10 organizations including Taiwan and Hong Kong media outlets, as well as the BBC, according to The Wall Street Journal.

“This is a self-organized cultural communication from members of Liyi Ba,” the organizers of the campaign wrote in a statement on their official Weibo microblog, the Journal reported. “We aimed to close the cognitive gap between netizens from both sides.”

Since the election on Saturday, Beijing has been concerned that Tsai and her independence-leaning DPP may push for independence from China. Xinhua, China's official news agency, wrote an editorial that described Taiwan’s independence aspirations as “poison,” while a Global Times editorial described them as being “hallucinations,” the Monitor reported.

Taiwan has been self-governing since 1949, but the Communist Party of China regards it as a territory that belongs to the mainland, and Beijing’s strict “One China” policy would not allow Taiwan to seek independence.

Tsai, in her victory speech, said that she wants good relations with China and is willing to meet Beijing halfway. But the Chinese government and many citizens remain wary of Taiwan.

“What they are saying is that something close to ‘One China’ has to come out of Tsai Ing-wen’s mouth eventually,” Shelley Rigger, a professor at Davidson College in North Carolina who studies Taiwanese politics, told the Monitor.

Ruan Chao-hsiung, a spokesman for the DPP, said that the users were exercising their freedom of speech, while Tsai wrote that "The greatness of this country lies in how every single person can exercise their own rights."

Taiwanese reacted to the Facebook comments with sarcastic messages congratulating the Chinese Netizens for being able to get past government censorship.

"We have freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and personal freedom," a user commented, according to Reuters. “You people have none of that."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.