IMF: Refugees can boost economies, only if Europe changes job requisites

Refugees coming to Europe can boost countries' GDP, the International Monetary Fund reports. But host nations need to rethink policies to help them quickly find jobs and training. 

Andrea Comas/ Reuters/ File
Syrian refugee Osama Abdul Mohsen (C) poses in front of his new home in Getafe, Spain, flanked by two of his sons, in this September 2015 file photo. This fall, a video of Hungarian camerawoman tripping Mr. Mohsen and his young son, Zaid, made headlines. He has now been offered a job in Madrid, working as a soccer coach.

More than 1 million migrants and refugees fleeing conflicts in the Middle East and Africa will give an immediate lift to struggling European economies, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) said in a report released Wednesday, cautioning European Union (EU) members that they must shift employment policies to turn short-term gains into long-term growth. 

Across the 28-nation bloc, aggregate gross domestic product (GDP) is predicted to rise 0.13 percent in 2017. In Germany, which has welcomed far more asylum-seekers than neighboring countries, that economic lift could be as high as 0.3 percent. The predictions are even better for Sweden and Austria: 0.4 percent and 0.5 percent, respectively.

The report comes amid calls to toughen immigration policies from leaders who fear cultural and financial consequences of Europe's changing demographics. German Chancellor Angela Merkel continues to insist "Wir schaffen das" — translated "We can do this" — as many Germans argue that no, they can't. 

"Not closing the border, just going on, would bring Europe to its knees," German transport minister Alexander Dobrindt said this week.

But "the negative effects of immigrant surges tend to be short-lived and temporary," as lead author Enrica Detragiache told reporters, noting that the "fiscal expansion that’s being carried out to provide for the refugees" would provide an immediate boost, as well. 

The long-term picture, however, presents greater uncertainty and risk. Historically, Europe has struggled to economically integrate many of its immigrants, creating social isolation as well. Some attribute these gaps to immigration policies that prioritized family reunification over job skills. In Germany, long-term immigrants' unemployment rates remain 3 percent higher than native Germans', and the IMF predicts that recent migrants will still experience 12 percent more unemployment than natives in 2020. 

But welcoming migrants could have significant benefits. Europe's most welcoming countries could see 1.1 percent higher GDP by 2020 if they adapt labor and immigration policies to facilitate newcomers' entrance into the job market, the IMF advises, echoing comments in its annual World Economic Outlook released earlier this month. 

The report encourages countries to facilitate employment by relaxing restrictions on asylum-seekers' right to work, creating easier routes to entrepreneurship, temporarily lowering wage minimums, and permitting migrants to move to where demand is highest. Some countries have been slow to adopt new EU legislation requiring members to offer work permits to asylum-seekers within nine months of filing their application, according to Human Rights Watch. 

The authors conclude that newly-arrived workers do not threaten jobs or wages, as commonly feared. Nor do they believe a "tipping point" exists, where the number of migrants would become economically unfeasible, Ms. Detragiache told the Guardian. 

But refugees do face unique challenges, compared to previous waves of family or economic immigrants. Historically, they've often fared worse. And, although many are skilled workers, their abilities may not be as needed in European markets, making job training a priority.  

Yet today's refugees may be better educated than yesterday's. Some 21 percent of Syrians arriving in Germany have a college education, for instance, compared with 23 percent of Germans themselves. But the longer refugees go without language training or job prospects, the harder it is to make use of those qualifications.

Several countries have begun combining cultural, language, and job training, preparing new arrivals to survive not just financially, but socially. In Sweden, for instance, immigrants who have arrived within the past three years are offered benefits to enroll in a 40 hour-per week program of language education and professional courses, from welding to gardening, which incorporate Swedish lessons into on-the-job practice. 

Although adult migrants may be better educated than in the past, refugees' children have often suffered disruptions in their own education. To keep growth going in the next generation, the IMF recommends that countries strengthen schools in often-isolated neighborhoods with a high percentage of immigrants, bolstering language support and teachers' own cultural training to properly address their pupils' needs. 

"The people who are coming to us want to change their lives – otherwise they wouldn’t come," Cologne Mayor Henriette Reker told Der Spiegel in early January, combatting alarm over migrant integration after attacks at the German city's train station on New Year's Eve. "We need to take decisive action to help them."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.