Whose responsibility is the child in that ISIS propaganda video?

The British government is investigating the origins of two possible British nationals involved in a recent Islamic State propaganda video.

Social Media via Reuters
A child speaks in this image from a handout video obtained on January 4 from a social media website that has not been independently verified. Britain was on Monday examining the Islamic State video showing a young boy in military fatigues and an older masked militant who both spoke with British accents.

London's mayor says a small child shown threatening non-Muslims in a grisly Islamic State video should be taken from his parents if the family ever returns to Britain.

The boy, thought to be 4 or 5, was identified by a man who told Britain's Channel 4 News that he is his grandfather. The man, whose daughter converted to Islam and moved to Syria with her family, said the boy doesn't know what he is doing and is being used for propaganda purposes.

The Associated Press isn't naming the grandfather to avoid identifying the child, who is seen on the video wearing camouflage and saying: "Go kill the kuffar (non-believer) over there!"

London Mayor Boris Johnson said Tuesday that that boy should be placed in foster care.

"This child is a victim of child abuse and he is, as I understand it, a British national," Johnson said. "I think we have a duty of care."

British intelligence officials wouldn't comment on what they call a live anti-terrorism investigation.

Helen Bower, spokeswoman for Prime Minister David Cameron, said an initial assessment has been completed, but that officials won't comment on the identities of the people involved "at any stage of the process."

The video, posted Sunday, features a masked man who speaks with a British accent before he and four masked colleagues use pistols to kill five purported spies at close range. The masked man appears to have stepped into the role formerly played by British citizen Mohammed Emwazi, who was killed by a drone strike in November after taking part in a series of beheading videos that earned him the nickname "Jihadi John."

British news media have said the man might be a British citizen who was born a Hindu and converted to Islam. That man was arrested in Britain in 2014 for suspected links to banned extremist groups, but fled to Syria after he was freed on bail. People who know him, including his sister, couldn't say for sure whether he is the man in the video.

Home Secretary Theresa May has agreed to brief Parliament later Tuesday to explain how the man was able to leave Britain for Syria despite having been arrested for terrorism-related offenses.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.