Anonymous hackers begin offensive against ISIS

After declaring war on the Islamic State, Anonymous says it has taken down more than 5,500 Twitter accounts associated with various IS members and associates. Will this information warfare work? 

Social Media Website via Reuters
A man wearing a mask associated with Anonymous makes a statement in this still image from a video released on social media on November 16, 2015. Anonymous has declared cyberwar on the Islamic State.

The hacker collective Anonymous claims it has already taken down 5,500 Twitter accounts in its cyber war against the militant group Islamic State (IS).

Anonymous released a video on Sunday saying they would launch the most important operation ever carried out against IS in retaliation for Friday's terrorist attacks in Paris, which killed at least 129 people and injured hundreds.

Announcing from its #OpParis account, Anonymous said Tuesday:

Over the past dozen years, Anonymous has been known for cyber attacks on government, corporate, and religious websites. But with increasing terrorism activities by fundamentalists such as Islamic State, Anonymous has been using its skills to wage a virtual war against IS and its online supporters. 

As Jaikumar Vijayan reported for The Christian Science Monitor:

Following the deadly attacks on the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo earlier this year, Anonymous launched a campaign dubbed #OpISIS to expose and destroy websites, social media accounts, and e-mail addresses of those it considered as affiliated with the terror group. Since then, it has claimed credit for shutting down several websites, and exposing e-mails, private networks, Internet addresses, and more than 9,000 Twitter accounts allegedly being used by Islamic State (ISIS) activists.

Once known as a puckish digital vigilante group, Anonymous now seems to be assuming some degree of civic responsibility. Earlier this month, the collective released a list of hundreds of names and social media accounts of Ku Klux Klan associates. Paul Williams, a hacktivist writer and occasional documentarian, writes of the group, “Anonymous had come to the conclusion that they were no longer abstractly playing with scatology and paedo bears.”

With its biggest operation against Islamic State already underway, shutting down IS social media presence, Anonymous says it's important to successfully weaken the group.

“They want to strike terror with their name, with bloody images, with violent videos. We cannot fight them with guns and rifles, stopping their propaganda is an effective way to weaken their manpower and their presence in the Internet. Disrupting their communications makes it difficult to organize their attacks in a fluid manner,” the person behind the Operation Paris account told the BBC.

In June, senior intelligence officials told Congress that Islamic State and other terrorist groups were increasingly using social media to attract new recruits in the United States.

“Unlike the centralized and secretive operations of Al Qaeda, Islamic State is successfully recruiting new members through aggressive use of social media, particularly Twitter,” the officials said.

The Christian Science Monitor reported that “estimates are that the terror group can generate up to 200,000 tweets per day based on the initial work of a couple thousand “core propagandists.”

Will the new intensified campaign by Anonymous really have any impact at all on IS?

"Cyberattacks can have a tremendous impact," cyberwarfare expert David Gewirtz told CBS News. "Of course, they can't be used to arrest people or take terrorists off the field, but they can certainly be used to compromise structural components of terrorist operations. More to the point, they can go after both the money that terrorists have and their funding sources. Damaging the money flow can certainly have an impact on the terrorists' operations."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Anonymous hackers begin offensive against ISIS
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today