Mustard gas was used in August attack on Syrian town, says weapons group

This is the first official confirmation of mustard gas use in Syria since the country agreed to destroy its stockpile of chemical weapons in 2013. 

Hassan Ammar/AP/File
Black columns of smoke rise from heavy shelling in the Jobar neighborhood in East of Damascus, Syria on Aug. 25, 2013. Weapons experts have said Mustard gas was used in an attack on a town in northern Syria in summer.

A report by an international chemical weapons watchdog group says mustard gas was used during summer fighting in a Syrian town where Islamic State (IS) insurgents were battling a rebel group.

The deadly gas was used in the town of Marea in the northern province of Aleppo on August 21, a source from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) told Reuters.

“We have determined the facts, but we have not determined who was responsible,” the source said.

On August 25, Doctors Without Borders (also known in French as Médecins Sans Frontières, or MSF) released a statement saying it treated four members of the same family who showed "symptoms of exposure to chemical agents" on August 21.

The MSF statement said the patients were from the town of Marea and came to a hospital run by MSF in the Syrian province of Aleppo.

Syria's government agreed to surrender its entire chemical-weapons supply under an agreement with the United States and Russia in September 2013. This was after the US threatened military action following a deadly sarin gas attack on a rebel-held suburb of Damascus that killed hundreds of people.

The last of Syria's acknowledged 1,300-ton chemical weapons stockpile, which included mustard gas and raw materials for making sarin nerve gas, was handed over in June 2014 to OPCW for destruction. But several Western governments have expressed doubt that the government of President Bashar al-Assad declared and handed over its complete stockpile.

Ahmet Uzumcu, the director general of the OPCW, said that it is possible Syria has avoided declaring some part of its arsenal, The Associated Press reported.

"I can't say that Syria doesn't have any chemical weapons anymore," he said. However, he added that is true for any country that his organization cooperates with, and Syria's declared arsenal was close to estimates made by external security analysts and experts.

The latest OPCW report is the first confirmation of mustard gas being used in Syria since the country agreed to destroy its chemical arsenal.

"It raises the major question of where the sulfur mustard came from," one source said. "Either they (IS) gained the ability to make it themselves, or it may have come from an undeclared stockpile overtaken by IS. Both are worrying options."

Sulphur mustard, commonly known as “mustard gas”, can cause serious injuries and is listed as a Schedule 1 chemical agent, meaning it has few uses outside warfare.

In the recent past, there have been growing fears that IS is using chemical weapons in both Syria and Iraq.

In August, the Pentagon said the militant group was suspected of having used them in an attack on Kurdish fighters in northern Syria. 

Though the US has been reluctant to wage on ground direct combat with ISIS, President Obama has in the past said that use of chemical weapons would cross a red line that could force American action, the New York Times reports

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.