Canada's Justin Trudeau: new Prime Minister and ... feminist?

A self-proclaimed feminist, Canada's new Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has appointed the country's first-ever gender-balanced cabinet, electing both 15 male and 15 female advisors.

Chris Wattie/Reuters
Canada's new International Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland (l.) is congratulated by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as Governor General David Johnston (r.) watches at Rideau Hall in Ottawa November 4, 2015.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made good on his campaign promise of a gender-equal cabinet Wednesday, appointing female candidates to 15 of his 30 cabinet positions.

“Canada has never really had a gender-parity movement before so it’s a big leap for us,” Jonathan Malloy, an associate professor at Ottawa’s Carleton University, tells NBC News. “Canadian politicians often talk about parity while running campaigns but it’s a big deal to actually do it.”

Trudeau’s female cabinet appointments include previous Treaty Commissioner and Regional Chief of the B.C. Assembly of First Nations Jody Wilson-Raybould as justice minister and attorney general, human-rights lawyer Catherine McKenna as environment and climate change minister and prominent academic physician-turned-politican Jane Philpott as health minister. Wilson-Raybould is also the first Aboriginal justice minister in Canada’s history.

“It’s a message to Canadian women – and young women in particular – that this world is about you,” Jean Charest, the former premier of Quebec who put women in half his provincial ministries in 2007, told Bloomberg. “You have to move beyond the old boy’s network.”

But some Canadians have voiced disagreement with Trudeau’s gender-parity appointments, arguing that the Prime Minister should simply pick the best candidates for the job.

Andrew Coyne, a Canadian columnist with the National Post, says the “dominant consideration in choosing a cabinet” should be talent and experience, not gender. Filling a female quota may open up a can of worms, Mr. Coyne says, because “it is impossible to embody the full range of social differentiation in a cabinet of any manageable size, [and] to balance the claims of competing identity groups for scarce cabinet seats.” 

Coyne argues that a female quota renders the cabinet ineffective and dispensable. “When a thing is truly important to us – like the national hockey team …we tend to place relatively greater emphasis on merit,” writes Coyne. And “where we have decided an institution is more or less useless,” representationalism (through Trudeau’s female cabinet quota) takes place.

But Trudeau’s supporters disagree.

“The more diverse your organization, your board, or, in this case, cabinet, the more it reflects the realities of the population we are serving, and that can only be a good thing,” Maryam Monsef, the new Liberal leader elected to represent the riding, or district, of Peterborough-Kawartha, told The Huffington Post Canada.

And gender-parity advocates say the female cabinet members should be held to the same standards as their male counterparts.

“These are very strong, able, capable women,” Frances Lankin, who served in three cabinet posts for Bob Rae’s Ontario government, told Metro News. “They will make their mark. Some will soar to the highest heights of competency, recognition and accomplishment – just as some men – and there will be some who turn out not to be so apt at the job – just as some men … If there is any talk of tokenism, it will disappear.”

Trudeau’s appointments signal an improvement in Canada’s gender-equality history. Last year, Canada ranked No. 50 in women’s government representation on the International Parliamentary Union’s list of 190 countries.

The recent appointments move Canada into 3rd place in the world rankings of governmental gender equality, behind only Finland, Sweden and the Atlantic archipelago of Cape Verde (who tie for second place). 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Canada's Justin Trudeau: new Prime Minister and ... feminist?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today