Why China is shifting to a 'two-child' policy

After decades of population control, China looks to implement a new, more expansive policy that will allow parents to have more than one child.

Ng Han Guan/AP/File
Visitors to the forbidden city hold children carrying Chinese national flags in Beijing, Nov. 16, 2013.

The era of China's "one-child" policy may finally be over.

Shifting demographics are largely responsible. Although China’s population stands at 1.37 billion today, Chinese officials estimate that it will decline to 1.3 billion by 2050, due to extremely low birth rates, and the census reveals that China faces both an aging population and a declining workforce.

In 2013, China began loosening the one-child policy for citizens who are urban, Han, and from an only-child household. The new, broader two-child policy is part of sweeping reforms that China plans to make over the next five years.

Experts from 21 Chinese think tanks recommended the changes in a report they recently submitted to authorities in Beijing. They said that the mainland's birth rate is 1.18 children for every couple, which is significantly lower than the global average of 2.5 children per couple, or even the 1.7 average in developed countries.

"China has undergone a birth rate below the replacement level of 2.1 for 20 years straight," said demographer Dr. Wang Feng to the South China Morning Post. "Its population will no doubt start to decrease in 10 years, even if the one-child policy is further relaxed immediately."

Not only would the two-child policy provide an immediate bump to China's population, but over time analysts project that it would grow China's shrinking workforce, as the children from the two-child policy eventually grow up and have children of their own.   

The new policy may signal the end of the human rights abuses which have occurred under the draconian one-child era. One of the most common effects has been sex-selective abortions that target female fetuses, both in rural families who would prefer a son to support the family and among family-planning officials adhering to traditional notions about gender.

According to projections from the Canadian Medical Association, these abortions have created a 10 to 20 percent excess of men in the next 20 years. The researchers found that 94 percent of unmarried people in China between the ages of 28 and 49 are male.

The study further estimates that even after the two-child policy is enacted, it will take several decades before the ratio between men and women in mainland China settles out.

Still, some people are optimistic that the new policy is a step in the right direction.

"In the past, the government failed to grasp the essence of the issue," said Liang Zhongtang, a demographer from the Shanghai Academy of Social Science, to The Guardian.

"The core issue is not about one child or two children," said Dr. Liang. "It’s about reproductive freedom. It’s about basic human rights."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.