Why Okinawa is outraged – again – over US military presence

The governor of Okinawa opposes plans to relocate a US military base, continuing a twenty-year saga that pits the Japanese-American alliance against locals fed up with Tokyo. 

Koji Harada/AP
Protestors scuffle with police at an attempted sit-in at American Camp Schwab in Okinawa, Japan on Tuesday. Okinawa Governor Takeshi Onaga revoked approval today for a plan to relocate a US air base from one part of the island to another, although the federal Japanese government plans to fight his decision.

Efforts to relocate an unpopular US marine base in Okinawa, Japan, to a less populated part of the island are meeting with renewed resistance, as Gov. Takeshi Onaga makes good on campaign promises to revoke approval for the plan. 

Okinawa, which makes up less than 1 percent of Japan’s land, has long hosted American forces, contributing almost 75 percent of land occupied by US military bases in Japan.

Okinawa is part of a chain of islands 400 miles south of the rest of the country, in a key position for the US and Japan to keep an eye on China’s growing aggression in the South China Sea.

In recent decades, a series of crimes committed by American servicemen, including the rape of a 12-year-old girl, have embittered locals against the US presence. Around 25,000 troops are stationed around the island of roughly 1.3 million.

Bowing to safety concerns, Japanese and American officials agreed more than 20 years ago to move Marine Corps Air Station Futenma from its current location in a crowded city center to a less populated corner of the island, but that's not far enough, say locals.

For two decades, local politicians and public protesters have called for the base to move off Okinawa entirely – a change Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is reluctant to consider.

Governor Onaga’s opposition, which included canceling construction permits, promises to draw out the base drama even further. It also forces the Abe Administration to decide whether the relocation merits a lengthy legal fight with Onaga – an move guaranteed to be unpopular with the people of Okinawa and one that could reinforce the prime minister’s "reputation for imperiousness," according to The New York Times.

Meanwhile, the US reaffirmed its support for the plan as key to Japanese-American military cooperation.

Military issues have dominated Japanese politics this year, as Mr. Abe pursues a controversial plan to reinterpret the Constitution’s ban on using so-called "Self-Defense Forces" in overseas combat.

The ban, imposed after World War II, sought to prevent Japan from projecting military power abroad and fend off any resurgence of colonialist aggression as in the years before and during the war.

Today, the US welcomes a strengthened Japanese military as it warily eyes China’s expanding might.

But Okinawa has its own reasons to treat military bases with caution.

Locals interviewed by the Japan Times report feeling "repeatedly betrayed" by the national government, part of a long history of distrust worsened by the last days of World War II, when up to 25 percent of civilians died during the Battle of Okinawa – many of them allegedly ordered by Japanese troops to commit suicide.

Today, the feeling persists that Okinawans' opinions don't matter in Tokyo.

"Okinawa doesn’t want to be a bargaining chip," said Okinawan Professor Masaaki Gabe to the New York Times in July. "And it is speaking out in ways that the rest of Japan has not."

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Okinawa is outraged – again – over US military presence
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today