Why Zimbabwe won't charge Walter Palmer for killing Cecil the lion

The American dentist sought for killing a beloved lion in Zimbabwe has been cleared of all charges, as authorities announce his hunt had been legally authorized.

Eric Miller/Reuters/File
Walter Palmer arrives at the River Bluff Dental clinic in Bloomington, Minn., Sept. 8. Zimbabwe will not charge American dentist Walter Palmer for killing its most prized lion in July because he had obtained legal authority to conduct the hunt, a cabinet minister said on Oct. 12.

Walter Palmer, the American dentist thrust into the spotlight after killing the beloved ‘Cecil the lion,’ will no longer face charges, a Zimbabwe cabinet minister said Monday.

Environment minister Oppah Muchinguri-Kashiri told reporters in Harare that Dr. Palmer had technically not violated any laws, as he had obtained legal permits to conduct the hunt.

In July, Ms. Muchinguri-Kashiri called for the Minnesota dentist to be extradited to Zimbabwe for poaching, reported The Christian Science Monitor. Reports said Palmer and his guide had lured the lion out of his habitat without legal permission and at night to be shot.

Palmer’s local guide, Theo Bronkhorst, and the game park owner have also been charged for allowing what officials said was an illegal $50,000 hunt.

Mr. Bronkhorst will appear in court on Thursday, where a judge will decide whether to drop the charges. Park officials said that prosecutors were planning to bring Cecil’s head to use as evidence in the trial.

Now, however, not only is Palmer cleared of all charges, but he is also allowed to return to Zimbabwe as a tourist.

Local conservationists immediately condemned the announcement, maintaining that Palmer, who is a lifelong hunter, had committed a crime and should be subject to legal action, if not in Zimbabwe then in the United States.

"The fact is the law was broken. We are going to get our advocates in America to actually see what they can do to bring justice to him," said Johnny Rodrigues, the head of the task force that first reported news of Cecil's killing.

Palmer has not responded to requests for comment, but he maintained his innocence in a previous statement:

"I had no idea that the lion I took was a known, local favorite, was collared and part of a study until the end of the hunt. I relied on the expertise of my local professional guides to ensure a legal hunt," he said in July.

In the months since Cecil’s killing, Palmer has received death threats and calls from residents in his Bloomington, Minn., community to leave town. Reporters and protesters showed up at his work, forcing the dentist to close his practice over the summer and wait for the backlash to die down.

The US Fish and Wildlife Service said in July it was investigating Palmer’s Zimbabwe hunt, though it is not clear now whether the investigation is still ongoing.

This report contains material from The Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.