Outrage after elephant killing: Has poaching reached a tipping point?

Yongki was a Sumatran elephant who worked with his handlers to patrol endangered habitats.

Heri Juanda/AP Photo/File
Ayu Rosalina, a two-day old baby Sumatran Elephant, stands near her mother at the Conservation Response Unit (CRU) in Ulu Masen, Aceh Jaya, Aceh, Indonesia, Thursday, Sept 20, 2012.

Yongki, a Sumatran elephant who worked with his handlers to patrol endangered habitats, was discovered dead on Friday, sparking a renewed global backlash against the practice of poaching endangered animals. The #RIPYongki hashtag has been trending on Twitter since the news broke, with condemnation coming in from around the world.

Yongki was special to the Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park in Sumatra because he was a tame elephant who was able to work with humans and elephants. As The Washington Post reported,  he was able to drive wild elephants back into the jungle to avoid potential conflicts between elephants and local farmers. He also worked with mahouts, or elephant riders, to patrol difficult terrain for farmers and illegal loggers who may have been encroaching on protected land.

"We are mourning the [loss] of an elephant who has been helping us in handling conflicts and helping forest rangers patrol the forest, and he was a good elephant," Nazaruddin, the head of the Indonesian Mahout Forum, told Agence France-Presse. He added that the mahouts in the park were “very shaken” by the elephant’s killing.

Sumatran elephants have been listed by the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) as critically endangered in the wild. Fewer than 3,000 remain in the wild, and the WWF reports that that number is steadily declining, with much of that loss coming from the past 25 years of deforestation. Their primary threat comes from interactions with humans. Those clashes have been increasing as farmers seek more grazing land for cattle, and loggers look for more viable forests.

“All staff [are] … very sad because [of] one elephant’s death in National Park,” a park official wrote in an e-mail to The Washington Post.

The Yongki tragedy comes on the heels of the global uproar over the killing of a Zimbabwean lion named Cecil by American dentist Walter Palmer and this week's World Rhino Day, which was intended to create awareness about species decline.

After the death of Cecil the lion, The Christian Science Monitor reported that global outrage prompted President Obama to create the CECIL Act in his honor, which severely restricts the importation of illegal animals killed as trophies. Protesters in Florida also spray-painted Mr. Palmer’s vacation home with the words “Lion killer.” Cecil was being researched by a group of Oxford scientists as part of a larger study, and had generated both popularity and tourist revenue for his home country during his lifetime.

It is not yet known who killed Yongki, but because he was found with a blue tongue, experts are determining that he may have been poisoned by poachers, according to MSN. The practice of poisoning elephants, either in addition to or instead of shooting them, is common; The Guardian reported in February that seven elephants, all from the same herd, were dispatched in this manner. Many locals consider elephants a nuisance and an interference with their crops. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.