Prisoner on hunger strike tests new Israeli law allowing force-feeding

Israeli politicians and doctors are clashing over a new law, which allows the force-feeding of inmates in the country's prisons.

Majdi Mohammed/AP
Palestinian girls, from left, Ghofran, Lane, and Mary, stand by the poster showing their uncle Mohammed Allan at the family house in the village of Einabus, near the West Bank city of Nablus, Sunday, Aug. 9, 2015. Allan has been 56 days on a hungers strike protesting one year long administrative detention by the Israeli authorities. Arabic on the poster reads: " No to the administrative detention.

An imprisoned Palestinian lawyer who started a hunger strike 60 days ago in response to his indefinite detention without known charges by Israeli authorities has reignited debate on the ethics of force feeding inmates, The New York Times reported.

The prisoner, Mohammed Allan, whose condition is now stable according to the medical spokeswoman at Barzilai Medical Center where he is being treated, was treated after his health severely deteriorated, the Times reported.

So far, no doctor has agreed to conduct force feeding on Allan, according to the Times.

Last month, Israel's parliament passed a law allowing the force-feeding of inmates. It would require Israel’s prison service to seek authorization from the attorney general and judge, who would “weigh a doctor’s opinion, the prisoner’s position, as well as security considerations before ruling in the matter,” The Associated Press said.

Israeli doctors and politicians disagree on the issue.

The Israel Medical Association (IMA) is challenging the law in Israel's Supreme Court. They urged physicians to stick by the body’s ethical code as described in a guide: “The physician shall not participate in the forced feeding of a hunger striking prisoner. The doctor-patient relationship is one of trust.”

The IMA said doctors should respect a patient’s autonomy while simultaneously informing them of risks.

Dr. Raphi Walden, a member of the group Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, condemned the ruling as one dictated by “politics and security,” the AP notes.

One of Allan’s lawyers, Jamil Khatib, told The New York Times, “This is about ego. Will Israel submit to the demands of a prisoner or not?”

Walden told the AP a doctor who complies with the new law risks sanctioning from the IMA but any IMA action would not affect a doctor’s medical license, which is authorized by the health ministry.

Israeli lawmakers say the ruling will save prisoners’ lives, protect doctors from legal action, and alleviate the fear hunger strikes could trigger violent protests in occupied Palestinian territories, according to the AP.

Discontent has already erupted within the country. On Wednesday, about 200 supporters of Allan clashed with Israeli right-wingers near the hospital, Reuters reported.

On Friday, Israeli authorities declared a state of emergency in all of its jails, which included a curfew on all prisoners, according to The Guardian.

Gilad Erdan, Israel’s Public Security minister, praised the new law and dismissed the IMA’s concerns on social media.

According to VICE News, he wrote on Facebook, “I am not willing to see the streets of Israel filled with hundred of wretched terrorists that went on hunger strike and were released.”

Some Palestinians feel the law is intended to weaken negotiating powers of prisoners who frequently use hunger strikes to protest administrative detention – a provision which authorizes Israeli authorities to detain inmates for six months and is often extended to prolong imprisonment for years.

Hunger strikes are, in a few instances, successful. In July, Israel released Palestinian detainee Khader Adnan after he went on a hunger strike for more than 50 days, The Guardian noted.

According to The Guardian, Israel’s prison service and the human rights group B’Tselem say nearly 400 Palestinians are currently detained indefinitely.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Prisoner on hunger strike tests new Israeli law allowing force-feeding
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2015/0814/Prisoner-on-hunger-strike-tests-new-Israeli-law-allowing-force-feeding
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe