World Elephant Day: Who buys Ivory?

A new research shows that over half of likely ivory buyers, including current owners, would support a government ban on all ivory trade.

Fabian Bimmer/Reuters
Four-week-old elephant Anjuli rubbing himself against his brother Assam in Hagenbeck Zoo in Hamburg, northern Germany on August 12, 2015.

As the world observes World Elephant Day this August 12, bringing attention to the precarious state of elephant populations worldwide, new research reveals how the demand side of the ivory market keeps the illegal trade alive.

A new international survey published Wednesday by the National Geographic Society and Globescan, says that the majority of people who buy ivory products, would also support banning the sale of ivory.

The research shows that 67 percent of likely ivory buyers, including current owners, would support a government ban on all ivory trade.

“There’s a clear disconnect between individuals saying, ‘I'm going to buy it’ and ‘I support enhanced regulations of the ivory trade,’” says Terry Garcia, the chief science and exploration officer for the National Geographic Society on their website. “Some of it is just rationalization; they've managed to construct an argument in their own minds as to why it's no harm.”

Buyers of ivory express genuine concern about cruelty towards animals, but only less than one-third of them believe that elephants are “very endangered,” while others feel that buying small pieces of ivory would not have a huge impact on elephant populations.

Over the past decades, attempts have been made to target the supply side of the ivory market. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, CITES, banned the ivory trade in 1989.

Additionally, domestic regulations and symbolic gestures like destroying huge amounts of ivory in public have attempted to send a message to those who supply the market.

But these acts have not been enough to stop the poaching. The global illegal trade in ivory has doubled since 2007, according to Wildlife Conservation Society. African Wildlife Foundation says today as few as 419,000 elephants may remain on the continent, as around 35,000 elephants are killed by poachers each year to feed the ivory black market.

After spending eight months researching the ivory trade in the top five importers – China, the United States, Thailand, Vietnam, and the Philippines – GlobeScan study suggests that anti-ivory-trade campaigns should also target the potential buyers.

“We've got to begin addressing the issue of demand and how you suppress it,” says Mr. Garcia. “How do you make it socially unacceptable to purchase illegal ivory.”

Seven in ten likely buyers see ivory as a status symbol, the study shows. These buyers include young fashionistas in low to middle-income brackets who see ivory as a way to project an image of wealth and social status.

The research suggests targeting these potential buyers: convincing them that ivory is uncool, and letting them know how the money from trading ivory is being spent.

Garcia says one approach would be making more people aware of how illegal ivory trade helps criminal syndicates and terrorist groups financially. “You don't care about the animals, how about supporting terrorism?" asks Garcia.

Besides targeting the ivory buyers, people can raise awareness about elephants through social media. Care2 suggests using hashtags such as #WorldElephantDay, #GoGrey, #SaveElephants, #96Elephants, and #SayNoToIvory.

And supporting elephant sanctuaries is another way. This year’s World Elephant Day sponsor, The Nature Conservancy, is trying to raise $150,000 for elephant conservation by making elephant art.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.