No more gory beheading videos: Why ISIS has banned execution videos

ISIS’s alleged leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, banned the dissemination of the group’s infamous execution videos in a report issued to ISIS media offices in Syria and Iraq.

Militant website via AP
n this photo released on June 25, 2015, by a website of Islamic State militants, an Islamic State militant fires an automatic weapon against Kurdish Peshmerga fighters in the village of Tel el-Reem, Iraq.

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who has been called the caliph of the self-proclaimed Islamic State (ISIS), has reconsidered the terrorist group’s gory media strategy.

Mr. Baghdadi banned the dissemination of the group’s infamous execution videos in a report issued to ISIS media offices in Syria and Iraq, according to local news sources. 

While the militant leader made no suggestion of curbing the group’s atrocities, he demanded that any released footage of beheadings should exclude scenes of the actual execution and only expose moments before and after the act takes place.

Though he leads one of the world’s largest terrorist groups, Baghdadi prohibited brutal footage out of his consideration for “Muslims and children’s feelings who may find these scenes grotesque,” an ISIS source told local media.

Some ISIS militants supported Baghdadi’s decision and agreed that their beheading scenes may be too “barbaric.” Others denounced the restriction and argued the footage is distributed to intimidate the groups’ enemies, not the common folk, ARA News reports.

The extremist group first shocked the globe last August when it distributed footage of one of its members, "Jihadi John," cloaked in all black and knife in hand, beheading American journalist James Foley. It was the first in a string of graphic and increasingly cinematic videos the group has released aiming to “sow terror and recruit followers,” writes the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).

Now that ISIS has seized substantial territory in Iraq and Syria and continues to recruit an estimate of 1,000 foreign fighters a month, the shock value of their videos might not be their top priority. 

Speaking with ARA News, Syrian politician and lawyer Ferid Hisso said the group isn’t worried about pleasing its victims or the public. Evidently, its acts speak for themselves and will continue to do so. 

The ban “won’t eliminate the IS-led horrors that have been seen by people around the world over the past couple of years,” Mr. Hisso said.  

“Instead of banning the release of such videos, Baghdadi should have rather banned the crimes behind the scenes. But he has already justified the barbarism of his followers, and his decision makes no sense,” Hisso added. 

Local observers say his decision may have been voiced a few weeks ago. The latest footage ISIS released after Baghdadi’s ban shows a young boy dubbed the “cub of the Caliphate” beheading a Syrian soldier, yet the clip didn’t feature any images of the actual execution. 

ISIS executed several high-profile hostages following Mr. Foley’s beheading last summer in a similar fashion, including American journalist Steven Sotloff in September and Japanese reporter Kenji Goto in January. 

Three days after releasing footage of Mr. Goto’s beheading, the group shared one of its most professionally produced videos, in which Moaz al-Kasasbeh, a Jordanian fighter pilot, was burned alive in an outdoor cage. 

Whether or not viewers even watch ISIS’s graphic media, the group’s “strategy is to bypass established news organizations and reach the intended audience directly,” according to CPJ.  

“After all, ISIS fighters do not give interviews,” CPJ writes. “They speak directly into the camera.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.